Cited by 37School Health and Nursing EducationMental Health Treatment and AccessChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Promoting equity in the mental wellbeing of children and young people: a scoping review

Open access
Welsh, Jennifer, Strazdins, Lyndall, Ford, Laura, Friel, Sharon, O'Rourke, Kerryn, Carbone, Stephen, Carlon, Leanne·2015·Health Promotion International

Abstract

There is increasing emphasis on wellbeing as a target for mental health promotion, especially during the formative period of childhood. Despite growing research on the importance of mental wellbeing, there is little information on how to effectively promote it or how to promote it equitably. This article presents a scoping review of interventions which seek to promote mental wellbeing and reduce inequities in children and young people living in high income countries. We used Fair Foundations: The VicHealth framework for health equity (VicHealth (2013) Melbourne, Australia: The Victorian Health Promotion Foundation) to identify points of entry at three layers of influence: (i) socioeconomic, cultural and political contexts, (ii) daily living conditions, and (iii) individual and family health-related factors. We identified more than 1000 interventions which aimed to prevent or treat childhood mental illness, but there were far fewer that aimed to promote children's or young people's mental wellbeing. The interventions we studied were either universal or specifically targeted children from disadvantaged families: none explicitly used an equity framework to guide their design or evaluation or addressed social gradients in wellbeing. Most interventions remained focused on proximate factors, although we also identified a handful of interventions that sought to address children's access to services and their educational and neighbourhood environments. However, we found encouraging evidence that interventions in family and educational settings were successful in building children's strengths and supporting positive parenting, universally and within disadvantaged groups. Such positive programme evaluations signal the potential for using a proportionate universalism approach that emphasizes equity in the promotion of mental wellbeing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/heapro/dav053

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Welsh, J., Strazdins, L., Ford, L., Friel, S., O'Rourke, K., Carbone, S., & Carlon, L.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (AU)
Venue
Health Promotion International
Published
2015-09
Volume
30
Issue
suppl 2
Pages
ii36-ii76
ISSN
  • 0957-4824 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2245
OpenAlex
W2180182443
Cited by
37
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Promotion International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council (FT110100686)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
youth mental health, health equity, mental health promotion, disadvantaged families, social gradient, proportionate universalism, positive parenting, family intervention, educational environment, access to mental health care
MeSH terms
Health Equity, Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Australia, Child, Psychology, Child, Child Welfare, Health Promotion, Humans, Mental Health, Program Evaluation, Parenting, Vulnerable Populations, Social Determinants of Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review