Cited by 22Asthma and respiratory diseasesChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchOccupational exposure and asthma

Patients' perceptions of the potential of breathing training for asthma: a qualitative study

Open access
Arden-Close, Emily, Teasdale, Emma, Tonkin-Crine, Sarah, Pitre, Natasha, Stafford-Watson, Mark, Gibson, Denise, Bruton, Anne, Thomas, Mike +1 more·2013·Primary Care Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Background Poor symptom control is common in asthma. Breathing training exercises may be an effective adjunct to medication; it is therefore important to understand facilitators and barriers to uptake of breathing training exercises.Aims To gain insight into patients' perceptions of breathing training exercises designed to help control asthma symptoms.Methods Semi-structured think-aloud interviews were conducted with 29 people with asthma about their views of a booklet on breathing training exercises.Results Thematic analysis showed breathing training exercises were seen as acceptable in principle because they were viewed as nonpharmacological, holistic, unobtrusive, and likely to increase patient confidence in managing symptoms. Anticipated disadvantages included the time required and perceived irrelevance for those with well-controlled asthma. These views were influenced by prior experience of changing breathing, wanting to self-manage asthma, negative views of medication, and perceived asthma control/severity. Anticipated barriers to carrying out the exercises included difficulties with nose breathing, remembering to do them, and persevering with them. Anticipated facilitators included monitoring tools and social support.Conclusions The idea of breathing training was viewed positively as an acceptable non-pharmacological treatment that patients can do discreetly to help them breathe more easily and reduce their reliance on medication. Uptake of breathing training may be greater among those who perceive their asthma as severe and/or have negative views of medication. To enhance uptake, it might be helpful to present breathing training exercises as holistic skills that can also benefit those with mild symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00092

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arden-Close, E., Teasdale, E., Tonkin-Crine, S., Pitre, N., Stafford-Watson, M., Gibson, D., Bruton, A., Thomas, M., & Yardley, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • Southampton General Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Arden-Close, Emily
Venue
Primary Care Respiratory Journal
Published
2013-11-14
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
449-453
ISSN
  • 1471-4418 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-1534
OpenAlex
W2050762591
Cited by
22
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Primary Care Respiratory Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University) (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (SRF-2012-05-120, 09/104/19)
  • Health Technology Assessment Programme (09/104/19)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
Keywords
asthma, breathing exercises, patient perspectives, non-pharmacological treatment, self-management, symptom management, medication adherence, acceptability, barriers and facilitators, think-aloud interviews, patient education booklet, social support
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Asthma, Attitude to Health, Breathing Exercises, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review