Cited by 78Physical Activity and HealthSchool Health and Nursing EducationHealth Policy Implementation Science

Process evaluation results from a school- and community-linked intervention: The Trial of Activity for Adolescent Girls (TAAG)

Open access
Young, D. R., Steckler, A., Cohen, S., Pratt, C., Felton, G., Moe, S. G., Pickrel, J., Johnson, C. C. +4 more·2007·Health Education Research

Abstract

Process evaluation is a component of intervention research that evaluates whether interventions are delivered and received as intended. Here, we describe the process evaluation results for the Trial of Activity for Adolescent Girls (TAAG) intervention. The intervention consisted of four synergistic components designed to provide supportive school- and community-linked environments to prevent the decline in physical activity in adolescent girls. Process evaluation results indicate that the intervention components were delivered from intervention staff to teachers with high fidelity (84-97%) to the protocol and with lower fidelity (range: 18-93%) from teachers to students. Physical activity programs for girls, a unique feature of the TAAG intervention, increased from a mean of 10 programs per school to a mean of 16 and 15 in years 1 and 2, respectively, in intervention schools, with no change in control schools. These findings suggest that a multicomponent school- and community-based physical activity intervention can be delivered with fidelity and result in a middle school environment that supports physical activity for girls.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/her/cyn029

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18]Webber LS Catellier DJ Lytle LA Promoting physical activity in adolescent girls. Trial of activity for adolescent girls Am J Prev Med 2008 34 173 184 18312804 PMC2275165

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Young, D. R., Steckler, A., Cohen, S., Pratt, C., Felton, G., Moe, S. G., Pickrel, J., Johnson, C. C., Grieser, M., Lytle, L. A., Lee, J. S., & Raburn, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • Tulane University (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Young, D. R.
Venue
Health Education Research
Published
2007-10-22
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
976-986
ISSN
  • 0268-1153 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3648
OpenAlex
W2100585434
Cited by
78
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Health Education Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01hl066845-06)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01HL066856, U01HL066858, U01HL66858, U01HL066853, U01 HL-066845, U01HL066852, U01HL066855, U01HL-66853, U01HL-66845, U01HL-66856, U01HL66852, U01HL-66857, U01HL66855, U01HL066857)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
adolescent girls, physical activity, school-based intervention, community-based intervention, intervention fidelity, implementation fidelity, junior high school, physical activity programs, school-community partnership
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Community-Institutional Relations, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Motor Activity, Physical Education and Training, Schools, Women's Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review