Cited by 87Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

A brief structured education programme enhances self-care practices and improves glycaemic control in Malaysians with poorly controlled diabetes

Tan, M. Y., Magarey, J. M., Chee, S. S., Lee, L. F., Tan, M. H.·2011·Health Education Research

Abstract

We assessed the effectiveness of a brief structured diabetes education programme based on the concept of self-efficacy on self-care and glycaemic control using single-blind study design. One hundred and sixty-four participants with poorly controlled diabetes from two settings were randomized using computer-generated list into control (n = 82) and intervention (n = 82) groups, of which 151 completed the study. Monthly interventions over 12 weeks addressed the self-care practices of diet, physical activity, medication adherence and self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). These self-care practices were assessed at Weeks 0 and 12 using pre- and post-questionnaires in both groups together with glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and diabetes knowledge. In the intention-to-treat analysis (n = 164), the intervention group improved their SMBG (P = <0.001), physical activity (P = 0.001), HbA1c (P = 0.03), diabetes knowledge (P = <0.001) and medication adherence. At Week 12, HbA1c difference adjusted for SMBG frequency, medication adherence and weight change remained significant (P = 0.03) compared with control group. For within group comparisons, diabetes knowledge (P = <0.001), HbA1c level (P = <0.001), SMBG (P = <0.001) and medication adherence (P = 0.008) improved from baseline in the intervention group. In the control group, only diabetes knowledge improved (P = <0.001). These findings can contribute to the development of self-management diabetes education in Malaysia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/her/cyr047

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tan, M. Y., Magarey, J. M., Chee, S. S., Lee, L. F., & Tan, M. H.
Affiliations
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • University Malaya Medical Centre (MY)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Health Education Research
Published
2011-06-29
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
896-907
ISSN
  • 0268-1153 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3648
OpenAlex
W2118986068
Cited by
87
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Education Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
diabetes education, self-care, glycemic control, self-efficacy, self-monitoring of blood glucose, medication adherence, physical activity, diet, HbA1c, diabetes knowledge, uncontrolled diabetes, self-management education, Malaysia
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Diabetic, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Malaysia, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Education as Topic, Self Care, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Single-Blind Method, Self Efficacy, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review