Cited by 136Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersRNA Research and SplicingGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases

A novel RNA binding nuclear protein that interacts with the fragile X mental retardation (FMR1) protein

Bardoni, B., Schenck, A., Louis Mandel, J.·1999·Human Molecular Genetics

Abstract

Silenced expression of the FMR1 gene is responsible for the fragile X syndrome. The FMR1 gene codes for an RNA binding protein (FMRP), which can shuttle between the nucleus and the cytoplasm and is found associated to polysomes in the cytoplasm. By two-hybrid assay in yeast, we identified a novel protein interacting with FMRP: nuclear FMRP interacting protein (NUFIP). NUFIP mRNA expression is strikingly similar to that of the FMR1 gene in neurones of cortex, hippocampus and cerebellum. At the subcellular level, NUFIP colocalizes with nuclear isoforms of FMRP in a dot-like pattern. NUFIP presents a C2H2 zinc finger motif and a nuclear localization signal, but has no homology to known proteins and shows RNA binding activity in vitro. NUFIP does not interact with the FMRP homologues encoded by the FXR1 and FXR2 genes. Thus, these results indicate a specific nuclear role for FMRP.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/hmg/8.13.2557

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CYFIP1-FMRP interaction was initially identified by two-hybrid screening in yeast.

    “The CYFIP1-FMRP interaction, initially identified by two-hybrid screening in yeast (Bardoni et al., 1999; Schenck et al., 2001), was confirmed by GST pull-down and immunoprecipitation both in mouse and fly cell lines and tissues (Schenck et al., 2001, 2003; De Rubeis et al., 2013).”

    From New insights into the regulatory function of CYFIP1 in the context of WAVE- and FMRP-containing complexes (2017) · cites this paper as Bardoni et al., 1999

    The Results and Discussion describe a yeast two-hybrid screen for FMRP interactors, so the screening method is supported. But the paper identifies NUFIP—not CYFIP1—as the novel interactor found by that screen. The cited paper therefore does not establish the claimed CYFIP1–FMRP identification. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Hagerman, R.J. (1992) In Hagerman, R.J and Silverman, A.C. (eds), Fragile X Syndrome: Diagnosis, Treatment and Research. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, pp. 1-68.
  2. Imbert, G., Feng, Y., Nelso, D.L., Warren, S.T and Mandel, J.L. (1998) In Warren, S.T and Hayden, M.R. (eds), Genetics Instabilities and Hereditary Neurological Diseases. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 27-53.
  3. La Morte, V.J., Dyck, J.A., Ochs, R.L. and Evans, R.M. (1998) Localization of nascent RNA and CREB binding protein with the PML- containing nuclear body. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 4991-4996.
  4. Ausubel, F.M., Brent, R., Kingston, R.E., Moore, D.D., Seidman, J.G., Smith, J.H and Stuhl, K. (1987) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Greene Publishing Associates and Wiley Interscience, New York, NY, pp. 13.6.2-13.6.24.
  5. O'Reilly, D.R. (1997) Use of baculovirus expression vectors. Methods Mol. Biol., 62, 235-246.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bardoni, B., Schenck, A., & Louis Mandel, J.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Human Molecular Genetics
Published
1999-12-01
Volume
8
Issue
13
Pages
2557-2566
ISSN
  • 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2083
OpenAlex
W2118593615
Cited by
136
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Molecular Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
FMRP, fragile X syndrome, FMR1 gene, RNA-binding proteins, protein-protein interaction, nuclear localization, C2H2 zinc finger, FXR1, FXR2, neuronal gene expression
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Brain, Cell Nucleus, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Fragile X Syndrome, HeLa Cells, Humans, Intellectual Disability, Molecular Sequence Data, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Nuclear Proteins, Recombinant Proteins, Yeasts, Gene Expression, Zinc Fingers, RNA-Binding Proteins, In Situ Hybridization, Microscopy, Confocal, COS Cells, Two-Hybrid System Techniques, Mice, Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein, Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review