CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In-frame deletion in a novel centrosomal/ciliary protein CEP290/NPHP6 perturbs its interaction with RPGR and results in early-onset retinal degeneration in the rd16 mouse

Chang, Bo, Khanna, Hemant, Hawes, Norman, Jimeno, David, He, Shirley, Lillo, Concepcion, Parapuram, Sunil K., Cheng, Hong, Scott, Alison, Hurd, Ron E., Sayer, John A., Otto, Edgar A., Attanasio, Massimo, O'Toole, John F., Jin, Genglin, Shou, Chengchao, Hildebrandt, Friedhelm, Williams, David S., Heckenlively, John R., Swaroop, Anand·2006·Human Molecular Genetics
DOI 10.1093/hmg/ddl107
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/hmg/ddl107

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Examination of the rd16 mouse retina. ( A ) Fundus photographs of WT C57BL/6J mouse and the rd16 homozygote mutants ( rd16/rd16 ) demonstrating retinal degeneration at 1 month of age and at 2 months. ( B ) ERG responses of WT and mutant ( rd16/rd16 ) mice under dark- (SCOTOPIC) and light- (PHOTOPIC) adapted conditions. Arrows indicate the A-wave and arrowheads the B-wave. ( C ) Histology of retina of WT and rd16 homozygotes mice at indicated ages. RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; OS, outer segments; IS, inner segments; ONL, outer nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer.
Figure 1 Examination of the rd16 mouse retina. ( A ) Fundus photographs of WT C57BL/6J mouse and the rd16 homozygote mutants ( rd16/rd16 ) demonstrating retinal degeneration at 1 month of age and at 2 months. ( B ) ERG responses of WT and mutant ( rd16/rd16 ) mice under dark- (SCOTOPIC) and light- (PHOTOPIC) adapted conditions. Arrows indicate the A-wave and arrowheads the B-wave. ( C ) Histology of retina of WT and rd16 homozygotes mice at indicated ages. RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; OS, outer segments; IS, inner segments; ONL, outer nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer.CC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Figure 2 Cep290 mutation in rd16 . ( A ) Linkage cross-data: 165 back-cross progeny from the ( rd16 -CAST/EiJ)F1 -rd16/rd16 were phenotyped for ERG phenotype and genotyped for the indicated microsatellite markers. Black boxes represent homozygosity for rd16 -derived alleles and white boxes represent heterozygosity for rd16 - and CAST-derived alleles. The number of animals sharing the corresponding haplotype is indicated below each column of squares. The order of marker loci was determined by minimizing the number of crossovers. The rd16 locus was inferred from the ERG phenotype of mice showing recombinations. ( B ) Genetic map of mouse chromosome 10 showing the rd16 critical region, which is syntenic to human chromosome 12q21.1. ( C ) Real-time RT-PCR analysis of BC004690 ( Cep290 , exons 27-48) in the retina of WT mice. The expression levels at different developmental stages were calculated as relative fold change with respect to embryonic day, E14, after normalization to Hprt levels. P, postnatal day. Each bar represents the mean + SE ( n ¼ 6). ( D ) Real-time RT-PCR analysis of BC004690 in the retina of Crx 2 / 2 and Nrl 2 / 2 versus WT mice. The expression levels in the Crx 2 / 2 and Nrl 2 / 2 retina were calculated as percentage of the level in the WT mouse retina after normalization to Hprt levels. Each bar represents the mean + SE ( n ¼ 6). ( E ) RT-PCR analysis (with F2-R2 primer set) of BC004690 using rd16 and WT retinal RNA. A 1.2 kb band is detected in rd16 compared with a 2.1 kb product in WT. DNA size markers are shown on the left (in kb). ( F ) BC004690 sequence in rd16 showing an in-frame deletion of 897 bp encompassing exons 35-39. Three-letter codes for amino acids were used. ( G ) Southern analysis of WT and rd16 DNAusing an exon 34 probe. DNA was digested with Eco RV, which cuts the WT DNA five times between exons 34 and 40, whereas in the rd16 DNA, only three Eco RV sites remain. WT DNA gave the expected band of 10.6 kb, whereas with the rd16 DNA, a heavier band at  15 kb (indicated by arrows) is seen. Molecular weight markers are in kilobases. ( H ) Schematic representation of the Cep290 gene and the CEP290 and D CEP290 proteins showing putative domains and motifs. CC, coiled-coil; KID, RepA/Rep þ protein KID; P-loop, ATP-GTP-binding site motif A; spindle association (SA) domain; MYO-Tail, myosin tail homology domain.
Figure 2 Cep290 mutation in rd16 . ( A ) Linkage cross-data: 165 back-cross progeny from the ( rd16 -CAST/EiJ)F1 -rd16/rd16 were phenotyped for ERG phenotype and genotyped for the indicated microsatellite markers. Black boxes represent homozygosity for rd16 -derived alleles and white boxes represent heterozygosity for rd16 - and CAST-derived alleles. The number of animals sharing the corresponding haplotype is indicated below each column of squares. The order of marker loci was determined by minimizing the number of crossovers. The rd16 locus was inferred from the ERG phenotype of mice showing recombinations. ( B ) Genetic map of mouse chromosome 10 showing the rd16 critical region, which is syntenic to human chromosome 12q21.1. ( C ) Real-time RT-PCR analysis of BC004690 ( Cep290 , exons 27-48) in the retina of WT mice. The expression levels at different developmental stages were calculated as relative fold change with respect to embryonic day, E14, after normalization to Hprt levels. P, postnatal day. Each bar represents the mean + SE ( n ¼ 6). ( D ) Real-time RT-PCR analysis of BC004690 in the retina of Crx 2 / 2 and Nrl 2 / 2 versus WT mice. The expression levels in the Crx 2 / 2 and Nrl 2 / 2 retina were calculated as percentage of the level in the WT mouse retina after normalization to Hprt levels. Each bar represents the mean + SE ( n ¼ 6). ( E ) RT-PCR analysis (with F2-R2 primer set) of BC004690 using rd16 and WT retinal RNA. A 1.2 kb band is detected in rd16 compared with a 2.1 kb product in WT. DNA size markers are shown on the left (in kb). ( F ) BC004690 sequence in rd16 showing an in-frame deletion of 897 bp encompassing exons 35-39. Three-letter codes for amino acids were used. ( G ) Southern analysis of WT and rd16 DNAusing an exon 34 probe. DNA was digested with Eco RV, which cuts the WT DNA five times between exons 34 and 40, whereas in the rd16 DNA, only three Eco RV sites remain. WT DNA gave the expected band of 10.6 kb, whereas with the rd16 DNA, a heavier band at  15 kb (indicated by arrows) is seen. Molecular weight markers are in kilobases. ( H ) Schematic representation of the Cep290 gene and the CEP290 and D CEP290 proteins showing putative domains and motifs. CC, coiled-coil; KID, RepA/Rep þ protein KID; P-loop, ATP-GTP-binding site motif A; spindle association (SA) domain; MYO-Tail, myosin tail homology domain.CC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Figure 3 Expression and localization of CEP290. ( A ) COS-1 cells were transfected with empty vector (mock) or a vector encoding full-length human CEP290 protein fused to a myc-tag. Cells were lysed and analyzed by immunoblotting (IB), using anti-myc (upper panel) or anti-CEP290 antiserum (lower panel). Arrows indicate specific bands. The immunoreactive band in the mock transfected lane (lower panel) is endogenous CEP290 protein. Pre-immune serum shows no signal (data not shown). ( B ) Immunoblots of protein extracts from WT (20 m g) and rd16 (200 m g) retina were analyzed using CEP290 antibody. Arrows indicate the full length and predicted alternatively spliced products of CEP290. ( C ) Immunohistochemical analysis of WT mouse retina. The sections were incubated with the CEP290 antibody followed by secondary antibody incubation. (a) and (c) Nomarski image of the retinal sections. (b) and (d) Staining with the CEP290 antibody (green) reveals intense labeling of the connecting cilium (indicated by arrows). Labeling in the IS is also observed. Scale bar: 40 m m for (a), (b); 10 m m for (c), (d). ( D ) CEP290 (green) co-localizes with g -tubulin (red; upper panel) and PCM1 (red; lower panel) at the centrosomes (arrows; merge) in IMCD-3 cells. Bisbenzimide (BIS) was used to stain the DNA. ( E ) CEP290 is associated with centrosomes during cell cycle. Synchronized HeLa cells were co-stained with antibodies against g -tubulin (red) and CEP290 (green) and analyzed by confocal microscopy. Arrows indicate the centrosomal staining of CEP290 (merge) at all indicated stages of cell division. ( F ) IMCD-3 cells were transfected with p50-dynamitin expression construct. Cells were stained with p50 (red), CEP290 or g -tubulin (green) antibodies. Arrows denote centrosomal CEP290 and g -tubulin in untransfected cells, whereas arrowheads denote the localization of CEP290 and g -tubulin to centrosomes in p50-overexpressing cells. Merge image shows blue nuclear staining.
Figure 3 Expression and localization of CEP290. ( A ) COS-1 cells were transfected with empty vector (mock) or a vector encoding full-length human CEP290 protein fused to a myc-tag. Cells were lysed and analyzed by immunoblotting (IB), using anti-myc (upper panel) or anti-CEP290 antiserum (lower panel). Arrows indicate specific bands. The immunoreactive band in the mock transfected lane (lower panel) is endogenous CEP290 protein. Pre-immune serum shows no signal (data not shown). ( B ) Immunoblots of protein extracts from WT (20 m g) and rd16 (200 m g) retina were analyzed using CEP290 antibody. Arrows indicate the full length and predicted alternatively spliced products of CEP290. ( C ) Immunohistochemical analysis of WT mouse retina. The sections were incubated with the CEP290 antibody followed by secondary antibody incubation. (a) and (c) Nomarski image of the retinal sections. (b) and (d) Staining with the CEP290 antibody (green) reveals intense labeling of the connecting cilium (indicated by arrows). Labeling in the IS is also observed. Scale bar: 40 m m for (a), (b); 10 m m for (c), (d). ( D ) CEP290 (green) co-localizes with g -tubulin (red; upper panel) and PCM1 (red; lower panel) at the centrosomes (arrows; merge) in IMCD-3 cells. Bisbenzimide (BIS) was used to stain the DNA. ( E ) CEP290 is associated with centrosomes during cell cycle. Synchronized HeLa cells were co-stained with antibodies against g -tubulin (red) and CEP290 (green) and analyzed by confocal microscopy. Arrows indicate the centrosomal staining of CEP290 (merge) at all indicated stages of cell division. ( F ) IMCD-3 cells were transfected with p50-dynamitin expression construct. Cells were stained with p50 (red), CEP290 or g -tubulin (green) antibodies. Arrows denote centrosomal CEP290 and g -tubulin in untransfected cells, whereas arrowheads denote the localization of CEP290 and g -tubulin to centrosomes in p50-overexpressing cells. Merge image shows blue nuclear staining.CC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Figure 4 CEP290 and D CEP290 associate with RPGR-ORF15 and other centrosomal/microtubule-associated proteins in the retina. ( A, B ) IP was performed using ORF15 CP (A), CEP290 (B) antibodies or normal IgG from WT and rd16 retinal extract (200 m g each). The immunoprecipitated proteins were analyzed by IB using CEP290 (A) or ORF15 CP (B) antibodies. Input lane contains 20% of the protein extract used for IP. Longer exposure of the blot in (A) shows an immunoreactive band for D CEP290 in rd16 input lane (data not shown). Molecular weight markers are shown in kilo Dalton. Asterisk indicates the faint fulllength CEP290-immunoreactive band (290 kDa) immunoprecipitated from the WT retina using the ORF15 CP antibody. Arrow in (A) points to the D CEP290 protein immunoprecipitated from rd16 retina using ORF15 CP . Arrows in (B) indicate multiple RPGR-ORF15 isoforms recognized by the ORF15 CP antibody (29). Less high molecular weight (120-220 kDa) RPGR-ORF15 isoforms are immunoprecipitated by the CEP290 antibody in rd16 . ( C ) Immunocytochemistry using the CEP290 (green) and ORF15 CP (red) antibodies shows co-localization of endogenous CEP290 and RPGR-ORF15 in IMCD-3 cells. Arrows indicate co-localization (Merge). ( D ) WT and rd16 retinal extracts were subjected to IP using the CEP290 antibody and analyzed by IB using indicated antibodies. Input lane represents 5% of the total protein extract used for IP. Molecular weight markers are shown in kilo Dalton. Lanes 1 and 2: input from WT and rd16 retinal extracts; 3 and 4: IP using the CEP290 antibody from WT and rd16 , respectively; 5: IP with normal IgG from WT retina. ( E ) Reverse IP was performed by incubating protein extracts of WT retina with indicated antibodies for IP followed by IB using the CEP290 antibody. Molecular weight markers are shown in kilo Dalton.
Figure 4 CEP290 and D CEP290 associate with RPGR-ORF15 and other centrosomal/microtubule-associated proteins in the retina. ( A, B ) IP was performed using ORF15 CP (A), CEP290 (B) antibodies or normal IgG from WT and rd16 retinal extract (200 m g each). The immunoprecipitated proteins were analyzed by IB using CEP290 (A) or ORF15 CP (B) antibodies. Input lane contains 20% of the protein extract used for IP. Longer exposure of the blot in (A) shows an immunoreactive band for D CEP290 in rd16 input lane (data not shown). Molecular weight markers are shown in kilo Dalton. Asterisk indicates the faint fulllength CEP290-immunoreactive band (290 kDa) immunoprecipitated from the WT retina using the ORF15 CP antibody. Arrow in (A) points to the D CEP290 protein immunoprecipitated from rd16 retina using ORF15 CP . Arrows in (B) indicate multiple RPGR-ORF15 isoforms recognized by the ORF15 CP antibody (29). Less high molecular weight (120-220 kDa) RPGR-ORF15 isoforms are immunoprecipitated by the CEP290 antibody in rd16 . ( C ) Immunocytochemistry using the CEP290 (green) and ORF15 CP (red) antibodies shows co-localization of endogenous CEP290 and RPGR-ORF15 in IMCD-3 cells. Arrows indicate co-localization (Merge). ( D ) WT and rd16 retinal extracts were subjected to IP using the CEP290 antibody and analyzed by IB using indicated antibodies. Input lane represents 5% of the total protein extract used for IP. Molecular weight markers are shown in kilo Dalton. Lanes 1 and 2: input from WT and rd16 retinal extracts; 3 and 4: IP using the CEP290 antibody from WT and rd16 , respectively; 5: IP with normal IgG from WT retina. ( E ) Reverse IP was performed by incubating protein extracts of WT retina with indicated antibodies for IP followed by IB using the CEP290 antibody. Molecular weight markers are shown in kilo Dalton.CC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Figure 5 Localization of RPGR-ORF15, rhodopsin and arrestin in rd16 retinas. ( A-D ) Immunogold EM of WT or rd16 retinas with indicated antibodies. Labeling with ORF15 CP antibody showed a predominant connecting cilium (CC) staining of RPGR-ORF15 (A) as opposed to abnormal extensive labeling throughout the photoreceptor IS in the rd16 retina (B, C). Arrows indicate clusters of immunogold particles. Labeling of rhodopsin in the rd16 retina (D) is evident around the photoreceptor cell bodies (indicated by arrows) with no exclusive OS localization; N, nucleus. ( E, F ) Immunohistochemical analysis of the WT and rd16 retinas at P12, dissected under normal light/dark cycle, with antibodies against rhodopsin (E) or arrestin (F). As shown, both rhodopsin and arrestin are localized primarily in the OS of WT retina, whereas in rd16 , rhodopsin and arrestin are also detected in the ONL and ISs of photoreceptors. OS in the rd16 retina degenerate at P12 and therefore are represented in conjunction with the inner segments (OS/IS). Scale bar: 50 m m.
Figure 5 Localization of RPGR-ORF15, rhodopsin and arrestin in rd16 retinas. ( A-D ) Immunogold EM of WT or rd16 retinas with indicated antibodies. Labeling with ORF15 CP antibody showed a predominant connecting cilium (CC) staining of RPGR-ORF15 (A) as opposed to abnormal extensive labeling throughout the photoreceptor IS in the rd16 retina (B, C). Arrows indicate clusters of immunogold particles. Labeling of rhodopsin in the rd16 retina (D) is evident around the photoreceptor cell bodies (indicated by arrows) with no exclusive OS localization; N, nucleus. ( E, F ) Immunohistochemical analysis of the WT and rd16 retinas at P12, dissected under normal light/dark cycle, with antibodies against rhodopsin (E) or arrestin (F). As shown, both rhodopsin and arrestin are localized primarily in the OS of WT retina, whereas in rd16 , rhodopsin and arrestin are also detected in the ONL and ISs of photoreceptors. OS in the rd16 retina degenerate at P12 and therefore are represented in conjunction with the inner segments (OS/IS). Scale bar: 50 m m.CC-BY-NC · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Nigg, E.A. (2004) Centrosomes in Development and Disease, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. · DOI
  2. Doxsey, S. (2001) Re-evaluating centrosome function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol., 2, 688–698. · DOI
  3. Beisson, J. and Wright, M. (2003) Basal body/centriole assembly and continuity. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol., 15, 96–104. · DOI
  4. Badano, J.L., Teslovich, T.M. and Katsanis, N. (2005) The centrosome in human genetic disease. Nat. Rev. Genet., 6, 194–205. · DOI
  5. Young, R.W. (1968) Passage of newly formed protein through the connecting cilium of retina rods in the frog. J. Ultrastruct. Res., 23, 462–473. · DOI
  6. Marszalek, J.R., Liu, X., Roberts, E.A., Chui, D., Marth, J.D., Williams, D.S. and Goldstein, L.S. (2000) Genetic evidence for selective transport of opsin and arrestin by kinesin-II in mammalian photoreceptors. Cell, 102, 175–187. · DOI
  7. Besharse, J.C., Baker, S.A., Luby-Phelps, K. and Pazour, G.J. (2003) Photoreceptor intersegmental transport and retinal degeneration: a conserved pathway common to motile and sensory cilia. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 533, 157–164. · DOI
  8. Bowes, C., Li, T., Danciger, M., Baxter, L.C., Applebury, M.L. and Farber, D.B. (1990) Retinal degeneration in the rd mouse is caused by a defect in the beta subunit of rod cGMP-phosphodiesterase. Nature, 347, 677–680. · DOI
  9. Travis, G.H., Brennan, M.B., Danielson, P.E., Kozak, C.A. and Sutcliffe, J.G. (1989) Identification of a photoreceptor-specific mRNA encoded by the gene responsible for retinal degeneration slow (rds). Nature, 338, 70–73. · DOI
  10. McLaughlin, M.E., Sandberg, M.A., Berson, E.L. and Dryja, T.P. (1993) Recessive mutations in the gene encoding the beta-subunit of rod phosphodiesterase in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Nat. Genet., 4, 130–134. · DOI
  11. Haider, N.B., Jacobson, S.G., Cideciyan, A.V., Swiderski, R., Streb, L.M., Searby, C., Beck, G., Hockey, R., Hanna, D.B., Gorman, S. et al. (2000) Mutation of a nuclear receptor gene, NR2E3, causes enhanced S cone syndrome, a disorder of retinal cell fate. Nat. Genet., 24, 127–131. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Farrar, G.J., Kenna, P., Jordan, S.A., Kumar-Singh, R., Humphries, M.M., Sharp, E.M., Sheils, D.M. and Humphries, P. (1991) A three-base-pair deletion in the peripherin-RDS gene in one form of retinitis pigmentosa. Nature, 354, 478–480. · DOI
  13. Chang, B., Hawes, N.L., Hurd, R.E., Davisson, M.T., Nusinowitz, S. and Heckenlively, J.R. (2002) Retinal degeneration mutants in the mouse. Vision Res., 42, 517–525. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Akimoto, M., Cheng, H., Zhu, D., Brzezinski, J.A., Khanna, R., Filippova, E., Oh, E.C., Jing, Y., Linares, J.-L., Brooks, M. et al. (2006) Targeting of green fluorescent protein to new-born rods by Nrl promoter and temporal expression profiling of flow-sorted photoreceptors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 3890–3895. · DOI
  15. Blackshaw, S., Harpavat, S., Trimarchi, J., Cai, L., Huang, H., Kuo, W.P., Weber, G., Lee, K., Fraioli, R.E., Cho, S.H. et al. (2004) Genomic analysis of mouse retinal development. PLoS. Biol., 2, E247. · DOI
  16. Furukawa, T., Morrow, E.M., Li, T., Davis, F.C. and Cepko, C.L. (1999) Retinopathy and attenuated circadian entrainment in Crx-deficient mice. Nat. Genet., 23, 466–470. · DOI
  17. Nasmyth, K. and Haering, C.H. (2005) The structure and function of SMC and kleisin complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 74, 595–648. · DOI
  18. Guo, J., Jin, G., Meng, L., Ma, H., Nie, D., Wu, J., Yuan, L. and Shou, C. (2004) Subcellullar localization of tumor-associated antigen 3H11Ag. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 324, 922–930. · DOI
  19. Kim, J.C., Badano, J.L., Sibold, S., Esmail, M.A., Hill, J., Hoskins, B.E., Leitch, C.C., Venner, K., Ansley, S.J., Ross, A.J. et al. (2004) The Bardet–Biedl protein BBS4 targets cargo to the pericentriolar region and is required for microtubule anchoring and cell cycle progression. Nat. Genet., 36, 462–470. · DOI
  20. Dammermann, A. and Merdes, A. (2002) Assembly of centrosomal proteins and microtubule organization depends on PCM-1. J. Cell. Biol., 159, 255–266. · DOI
  21. Kim, J.C., Ou, Y.Y., Badano, J.L., Esmail, M.A., Leitch, C.C., Fiedrich, E., Beales, P.L., Archibald, J.M., Katsanis, N., Rattner, J.B. et al. (2005) MKKS/BBS6, a divergent chaperonin-like protein linked to the obesity disorder Bardet–Biedl syndrome, is a novel centrosomal component required for cytokinesis. J. Cell. Sci., 118, 1007–1020. · DOI
  22. Vaughan, K.T. and Vallee, R.B. (1995) Cytoplasmic dynein binds dynactin through a direct interaction between the intermediate chains and p150Glued. J. Cell. Biol., 131, 1507–1516. · DOI
  23. Hong, D.H., Pawlyk, B., Sokolov, M., Strissel, K.J., Yang, J., Tulloch, B., Wright, A.F., Arshavsky, V.Y. and Li, T. (2003) RPGR isoforms in photoreceptor connecting cilia and the transitional zone of motile cilia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 44, 2413–2421. · DOI
  24. Shu, X., Fry, A.M., Tulloch, B., Manson, F.D., Crabb, J.W., Khanna, H., Faragher, A.J., Lennon, A., He, S., Trojan, P. et al. (2005) RPGR ORF15 isoform co-localizes with RPGRIP1 at centrioles and basal bodies and interacts with nucleophosmin. Hum. Mol. Genet., 14, 1183–1197. · DOI
  25. Khanna, H., Hurd, T.W., Lillo, C., Shu, X., Parapuram, S.K., He, S., Akimoto, M., Wright, A.F., Margolis, B., Williams, D.S. et al. (2005) RPGR-ORF15, which is mutated in retinitis pigmentosa, associates with SMC1, SMC3, and microtubule transport proteins. J. Biol. Chem., 280, 33580–33587. · DOI
  26. Vervoort, R., Lennon, A., Bird, A.C., Tulloch, B., Axton, R., Miano, M.G., Meindl, A., Meitinger, T., Ciccodicola, A. and Wright, A.F. (2000) Mutational hot spot within a new RPGR exon in X-linked retinitis pigmentosa. Nat. Genet., 25, 462–466. · DOI
  27. Breuer, D.K., Yashar, B.M., Filippova, E., Hiriyanna, S., Lyons, R.H., Mears, A.J., Asaye, B., Acar, C., Vervoort, R., Wright, A.F. et al. (2002) A comprehensive mutation analysis of RP2 and RPGR in a North American cohort of families with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 70, 1545–1554. · DOI
  28. Sharon, D., Sandberg, M.A., Rabe, V.W., Stillberger, M., Dryja, T.P. and Berson, E.L. (2003) RP2 and RPGR mutations and clinical correlations in patients with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 73, 1131–1146. · DOI
  29. Dryja, T.P., Adams, S.M., Grimsby, J.L., McGee, T.L., Hong, D.H., Li, T., Andreasson, S. and Berson, E.L. (2001) Null RPGRIP1 alleles in patients with Leber congenital amaurosis. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 68, 1295–1298. · DOI
  30. Otto, E.A., Loeys, B., Khanna, H., Hellemans, J., Sudbrak, R., Fan, S., Muerb, U., O'Toole, J.F., Helou, J., Attanasio, M. et al. (2005) Nephrocystin-5, a ciliary IQ domain protein, is mutated in Senior–Loken syndrome and interacts with RPGR and calmodulin. Nat. Genet., 37, 282–288. · DOI
  31. Hong, D.H., Yue, G., Adamian, M. and Li, T. (2001) Retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RPGRr)-interacting protein is stably associated with the photoreceptor ciliary axoneme and anchors RPGR to the connecting cilium. J. Biol. Chem., 276, 12091–12099. · DOI
  32. Liu, Q., Zuo, J. and Pierce, E.A. (2004) The retinitis pigmentosa 1 protein is a photoreceptor microtubule-associated protein. J. Neurosci., 24, 6427–6436. · DOI
  33. Hong, D.H., Pawlyk, B.S., Shang, J., Sandberg, M.A., Berson, E.L. and Li, T. (2000) A retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RPGR)-deficient mouse model for X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (RP3). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 3649–3654. · DOI
  34. Piperno, G., Siuda, E., Henderson, S., Segil, M., Vaananen, H. and Sassaroli, M. (1998) Distinct mutants of retrograde intraflagellar transport (IFT) share similar morphological and molecular defects. J. Cell. Biol., 143, 1591–1601. · DOI
  35. Pazour, G.J., Baker, S.A., Deane, J.A., Cole, D.G., Dickert, B.L., Rosenbaum, J.L., Witman, G.B. and Besharse, J.C. (2002) The intraflagellar transport protein, IFT88, is essential for vertebrate photoreceptor assembly and maintenance. J. Cell. Biol., 157, 103–113. · DOI
  36. Nishimura, D.Y., Fath, M., Mullins, R.F., Searby, C., Andrews, M., Davis, R., Andorf, J.L., Mykytyn, K., Swiderski, R.E., Yang, B. et al. (2004) Bbs2-null mice have neurosensory deficits, a defect in social dominance, and retinopathy associated with mislocalization of rhodopsin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 16588–16593. · DOI
  37. Mykytyn, K., Mullins, R.F., Andrews, M., Chiang, A.P., Swiderski, R.E., Yang, B., Braun, T., Casavant, T., Stone, E.M. and Sheffield, V.C. (2004) Bardet–Biedl syndrome type 4 (BBS4)-null mice implicate Bbs4 in flagella formation but not global cilia assembly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 8664–8669. · DOI
  38. Li, T., Snyder, W.K., Olsson, J.E. and Dryja, T.P. (1996) Transgenic mice carrying the dominant rhodopsin mutation P347S: evidence for defective vectorial transport of rhodopsin to the outer segments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 14176–14181. · DOI
  39. Zhao, Y., Hong, D.H., Pawlyk, B., Yue, G., Adamian, M., Grynberg, M., Godzik, A. and Li, T. (2003) The retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RPGR)-interacting protein: subserving RPGR function and participating in disk morphogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 3965–3970. · DOI
  40. Avidor-Reiss, T., Maer, A.M., Koundakjian, E., Polyanovsky, A., Keil, T., Subramaniam, S. and Zuker, C.S. (2004) Decoding cilia function: defining specialized genes required for compartmentalized cilia biogenesis. Cell, 117, 527–539. · DOI
  41. Li, J.B., Gerdes, J.M., Haycraft, C.J., Fan, Y., Teslovich, T.M., May-Simera, H., Li, H., Blacque, O.E., Li, L., Leitch, C.C. et al. (2004) Comparative genomics identifies a flagellar and basal body proteome that includes the BBS5 human disease gene. Cell, 117, 541–552. · DOI
  42. Sayer, J.A., Otto, E.A., O'Toole, J.F., Nurnberg, G., Kennedy, M.A., Becker, C., Hennies, H.C., Helou, J., Attanasio, M., Fausett, B. et al. (2006) A novel centrosomal protein nephrocystin-6 is mutated in Joubert syndrome and activates transcription factor ATF4/CREB2. Nat. Genet., in press. · DOI
  43. Cheng, H., Khanna, H., Oh, E.C., Hicks, D., Mitton, K.P. and Swaroop, A. (2004) Photoreceptor-specific nuclear receptor NR2E3 functions as a transcriptional activator in rod photoreceptors. Hum. Mol. Genet., 13, 1563–1575. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 328

Metadata

Authors
Chang, B., Khanna, H., Hawes, N., Jimeno, D., He, S., Lillo, C., Parapuram, S. K., Cheng, H., Scott, A., Hurd, R. E., Sayer, J. A., Otto, E. A., Attanasio, M., O'Toole, J. F., Jin, G., Shou, C., Hildebrandt, F., Williams, D. S., Heckenlively, J. R., & Swaroop, A.
Venue
Human Molecular Genetics
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2006-04-21
Volume
15
Issue
11
Pages
1847-1857
ISSN
  • 1460-2083
  • 0964-6906
DOI
10.1093/hmg/ddl107
Cited by
328
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review