Cited by 840Retinal Development and DisordersRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsConnexins and lens biology

Retinal degeneration mutants in the mouse

Open access
Chang, B., Hawes, N.L., Hurd, R.E., Davisson, M.T., Nusinowitz, S., Heckenlively, J.R.·2002·Vision Research

Abstract

The Jackson Laboratory, having the world's largest collection of mouse mutant stocks and genetically diverse inbred strains, is an ideal place to look for genetically determined eye variations and disorders. Through ophthalmoscopy, electroretinography and histology, we have discovered disorders affecting all aspects of the eye including the lid, cornea, iris, lens and retina, resulting in corneal disorders, cataracts, glaucoma and retinal degenerations. Mouse models of retinal degeneration have been investigated for many years in the hope of understanding the causes of photoreceptor cell death. Sixteen naturally occurring mouse mutants that manifest degeneration of photoreceptors in the retina with preservation of all other retinal cell types have been found: retinal degeneration (formerly rd, identical with rodless retina, r, now Pde6b(rd1)); Purkinje cell degeneration (pcd); nervous (nr); retinal degeneration slow (rds, now Prph(Rd2)); retinal degeneration 3 (rd3); motor neuron degeneration (mnd); retinal degeneration 4 (Rd4); retinal degeneration 5 (rd5, now tub); vitiligo (vit, now Mitf(mi-vit)); retinal degeneration 6 (rd6); retinal degeneration 7 (rd7, now Nr2e3(rd7)); neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (nclf); retinal degeneration 8 (rd8); retinal degeneration 9 (Rd9); retinal degeneration 10 (rd10, now Pde6b(rd10)); and cone photoreceptor function loss (cpfl1). In this report, we first review the genotypes and phenotypes of these mutants and second, list the mouse strains that carry each mutation. We will also provide detailed information about the cpfl1 mutation. The phenotypic characteristics of cpfl1 mice are similar to those observed in patients with complete achromatopsia (ACHM2, OMIM 216900) and the cpfl1 mutation is the first naturally-arising mutation in mice to cause cone-specific photoreceptor function loss. cpfl1 mice may provide a model for congenital achromatopsia in humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00146-8

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bronson, R. T., Donahue, L. R., Johnson, K. R., Tanner, A., Lane, P. W., & Faust, J. R. (1998). Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (nclf), a new disorder of the mouse linked to chromosome 9. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 77(4), 289-297.
  2. Sidman, R. L., & Green, M. C. (1970). ÔNervousÕ, a new mutant mouse with cerebellar disease. In M. Sabourdy (Ed.), Les mutants pathologiques chez l'animal (pp. 69-79). Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
  3. Tang, M., Neumann, P. E., Kosaras, B., Taylor, B. A., & Sidman, R. L. (1992). Vitiligo maps to mouse chromosome 6 within or close to the mi locus. Mouse Genome, 90(3), 441-443.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, B., Hawes, N. L., Hurd, R. E., Davisson, M. T., Nusinowitz, S., & Heckenlively, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Jackson Laboratory (US)
  • Harbor–UCLA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Chang, B.
Venue
Vision Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-02
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
517-525
ISSN
0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012796647
Cited by
840
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 36
FWCI
7.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vision Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Foundation Fighting Blindness
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY007758, EY 11996, EY07758, R01EY011996)
  • National Cancer Institute (#CA34196, P30CA034196)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Connexins and lens biology
Keywords
retinal degeneration, mouse mutants, photoreceptor degeneration, achromatopsia, congenital achromatopsia, PDE6B, RD3, Purkinje cell degeneration, neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, vitiligo, MITF, NR2E3, motor neuron degeneration
MeSH terms
Animals, Electroretinography, Fundus Oculi, Mice, Mutant Strains, Retina, Retinal Degeneration, Rhodopsin, Apoptosis, Photoreceptor Cells, Vertebrate, Models, Animal, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review