The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Psychosocial experiences in women facing fertility problemsa comparative survey
Abstract
In a survey involving 281 patients awaiting assisted reproduction treatment at five centres in three countries, and 289 population controls, we investigated whether the patients had experienced more negative emotional feelings and negative emotional impact during periods when they were attempting to conceive as compared with the controls, and whether there was any difference in their well-being at the time of consultation. The study was performed in the context of currently divergent views as to the burden of fertility problems. The survey was carried out using questionnaires of the self-administration type. Women with fertility problems did in fact consistently report a higher prevalence of negative emotions than the controls with reference to the periods during which they had been trying to conceive. Patients reported more changes in interpartner relationships (either negative or positive). Sexuality was negatively affected among the patients. At the time of consultation, the patients had less favourable scores than the controls on scales for depressed mood, memory/concentration, anxiety and fears, as well as for self-perceived attractiveness. One in four (24.9%) of the patients had scores indicating depressive disorders as compared with only 6.8% of the controls. Current well-being was even more markedly affected in patients with previous unsuccessful in-vitro fertilization (IVF) experience. The 'infertility' life event was perceived as severe by both patients and controls. Both prior to consultation and during diagnosis and treatment, women with fertility problems had a higher prevalence of reported negative psycho-emotional experiences than women without fertility problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature
Greil, A. L., Slauson-Blevins, K., & McQuillan, J. (2010) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01213.x · Cited by 867
Increased risk of depressive disorders in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Hollinrake, E., Abreu, A., Maifeld, M., Van Voorhis, B. J., & Dokras, A. (2007) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.039 · Cited by 631
Clinical and psychological correlates of quality-of-life in polycystic ovary syndrome
Hahn, S., Janssen, O. E., Tan, S., Pleger, K., Mann, K., Schedlowski, M., Kimmig, R., Benson, S., Balamitsa, E., & Elsenbruch, S. (2005) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/eje.1.02024 · Cited by 387
Frederiksen, Y., Farver-Vestergaard, I., Skovgård, N. G., Ingerslev, H. J., & Zachariae, R. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006592 · Cited by 380
“In addition to the 0–5 points possible on the original Jadad scale, 1 additional point was given for each of the following: (1) was a control group included, in order to acknowledge whether the intervention group was compared with another group, although randomisation was not used; (2) were both predata and postdata p…”
MethodInfluentialPrevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders in an assisted reproductive technique clinic
Chen, T.-H., Chang, S.-P., Tsai, C.-F., & Juang, K.-D. (2004) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deh414 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Oddens, B. J.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-01-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 255-261
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2127996501
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychosocial experiences in women facing fertility problemsa comparative survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/14.1.255
- The paper
- Oddens, B. J. (1999). Psychosocial experiences in women facing fertility problemsa comparative survey. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.1.255
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.