Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 385

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Congenital malformations in infants born after IVF: a population-based study

Ericson, A., Kallen, B.·2001·Human Reproduction

Abstract

The presence of congenital malformations in infants born after IVF was studied from a register consisting of practically all infants born in Sweden after IVF, 1982--1997 (n = 9111). A further 64 infants were studied using only medical records. It is a nation-wide study and has a population-based control group (n = 1,690,577) and relevant potential confounders have been taken into account. There was an excess of congenital malformations registered in the Medical Birth Registry (n = 516, odds ratio = 1.47) but this excess disappeared when confounders were taken into consideration: year of birth, maternal age, parity, and period of unwanted childlessness (odds ratio = 0.89). For some specific conditions, an approximately 3-fold excess risk was seen: neural tube defects, alimentary atresia, omphalocele, and hypospadias (after intracytoplasmatic sperm injection). No excess risk for hypospadias was seen after standard IVF. Various explanations for these findings are discussed. It is postulated that the excess risk for alimentary atresia, like the excess risk for monozygotic twinning after IVF, is a direct consequence of the IVF procedure. The excess risk for hypospadias after ICSI may be related to paternal subfertility with a genetic background. The absolute risk for a congenital malformation in association with IVF is small.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/16.3.504

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • A quality study of a medical birth registry

    Cnattingius, S., Ericson, A., Gunnarskog, J., & Källén, B. (1990) · Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine · doi:10.1177/140349489001800209 · Cited by 972 · cited 1×

    “…numbers were calculated from the rates Registry, a registry based on the medical records of antenatal of each malformation in the population. care, delivery care, and the paediatric examination of the newborn The proportions of malformed infants born after ICSI or the (Cnattingius et al., 1990).”
    MethodSelf-citation

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 385

Metadata

Authors
Ericson, A., & Kallen, B.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2001-03-01
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
504-509
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2112737916
Cited by
385
References
1
FWCI
23.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Congenital malformations in infants born after IVF: a population-based study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/16.3.504
The paper
Ericson, A., & Kallen, B. (2001). Congenital malformations in infants born after IVF: a population-based study. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.3.504

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.