The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biological variation of seminal parameters in healthy subjects
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: A study was undertaken to assess the components of biological variation of seminal parameters in healthy subjects. METHODS: Twenty donor candidates were included in a 10-week follow-up study. Within- and between-subject biological variation, indices of individuality and heterogeneity, coefficient of reliability, critical differences, analytical goals and the lowest value observed with a <5% probability of having a true value less than the World Health Organization (1999) reference value were estimated for the following seminal parameters: concentration, total motility (WHO grades a + b + c), progressive motility (grades a + b), rapid progressive motility (grade a), sperm morphology and vitality. All analysis was performed by a single technician according to WHO 1999 guidelines for routine semen analysis. Analytical variation was assessed on different types of quality control material (frozen straws, sperm suspension, videotape, and slides) and at different (low, medium, high) quality levels. RESULTS: The analytical variation observed depended on the quality control material used and the level of semen quality. Concentration was the semen parameter with highest within- and between-subject variation, and vitality the lowest. Indices of individuality were all <0.7, and coefficients of reliability were high (0.68-0.84). The critical difference for sequential values significant at P < 0.05 for vitality, progressive motility and morphology (34.4, 49.2 and 58.0% respectively) were lower than for concentration (77.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The study results showed that conventional reference values for seminal parameters have little diagnostic value because of their marked individuality, though seminal parameters can be useful for assessing differences in an individual's serial results, in particular of progressive motility, morphology and vitality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sperm Morphology, Motility, and Concentration in Fertile and Infertile Men
Guzick, D. S., Overstreet, J. W., Factor-Litvak, P., Brazil, C. K., Nakajima, S. T., Coutifaris, C., Carson, S. A., Cisneros, P., Steinkampf, M. P., Hill, J. A., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa003005 · Cited by 1,336
Slama, R. (2002) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/17.2.503 · Cited by 308
Auger, J., Eustache, F., Andersen, A. G., Irvine, D. S., Jørgensen, N., Skakkebæk, N. E., Suominen, J., Toppari, J., Vierula, M., & Jouannet, P. (2001) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/16.12.2710 · Cited by 211
Cited by
European Academy of Andrology guideline Management of oligo‐astheno‐teratozoospermia
Colpi, G. M., Francavilla, S., Haidl, G., Link, K., Behre, H. M., Goulis, D. G., Krausz, C., & Giwercman, A. (2018) · Andrology · doi:10.1111/andr.12502 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Alvarez, C.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-10-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2082-2088
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2139862177
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological variation of seminal parameters in healthy subjects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/deg430
- The paper
- Alvarez, C. (2003). Biological variation of seminal parameters in healthy subjects. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg430
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.