Cited by 40Endometriosis Research and Treatmentmelanin and skin pigmentationDermatologic Treatments and Research

‘Here comes the sun’: pigmentary traits and sun habits in women with endometriosis

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is limited but interesting evidence suggesting that endometriosis may be associated with specific pigmentary traits and sun habits. In this case-control study, we aimed to further clarify this point. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with a first laparoscopic diagnosis of endometriosis according to Holt and Weiss criteria were selected as cases. Controls were women who underwent laparoscopy during the same study period, but who were found to be free of the disease. Selected women were interviewed and examined by two trained physicians. An unconditional logistic regression model that included age and baseline variables significantly differing between the two groups was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (OR). RESULTS: There were 98 women with endometriosis and 94 controls selected. Overall, women with the disease had a more photo-sensitive phenotype and were exposed less to sun or ultraviolet radiation. A statistically significant difference was documented for eye color, skin reaction to first sun exposure, freckles score and the use of tanning creams. The adjusted OR (95% CI) for the disease was 1.95 (1.02-3.72) for women with green/blue eyes, 2.19 (1.12-4.28) for those who frequently/always had skin burn reaction to first sun exposure, 5.67 (1.98-16.24) for those with a higher number of freckles and 0.35 (0.15-0.85) for the use of tanning creams. CONCLUSIONS: Women with endometriosis have a specific photo-sensitive phenotype and protect themselves more from the sun. This latter habit may be consequent to the former. We speculate that there is a shared genetic background between pigmentation and endometriosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/dep453

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Somigliana, E., Vigano, P., Abbiati, A., Gentilini, D., Parazzini, F., Benaglia, L., Vercellini, P., & Fedele, L.
Affiliations
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT)
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2010-01-17
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
728-733
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2158909808
Cited by
40
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
endometriosis, UV exposure, eye color, freckles, sunburn, genetic susceptibility, skin pigmentation
MeSH terms
Adult, Beauty Culture, Endometriosis, Eye Color, Female, Humans, Melanosis, Phenotype, Photosensitivity Disorders, Skin Pigmentation, Sunlight, Sunscreening Agents, Case-Control Studies, Sunbathing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review