Cited by 211Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

The search for genes contributing to endometriosis risk

Open access
Montgomery, Grant W., Nyholt, Dale R., Zhao, Zhen Zhen, Treloar, Susan A., Painter, Jodie N., Missmer, Stacey A., Kennedy, Stephen H., Zondervan, Krina T.·2008·Human Reproduction Update

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Genetic variation contributes to the risk of developing endometriosis. This review summarizes gene mapping studies in endometriosis and the prospects of finding gene pathways contributing to disease using the latest genome-wide strategies. METHODS: To identify candidate-gene association studies of endometriosis, a systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed of publications up to 1 April 2008, using the search terms 'endometriosis' plus 'allele' or 'polymorphism' or 'gene'. Papers included were those with information on both case and control selection, showed allelic and/or genotypic results for named germ-line polymorphisms and were published in the English language. RESULTS: Genetic variants in 76 genes have been examined for association, but none shows convincing evidence of replication in multiple studies. There is evidence for genetic linkage to chromosomes 7 and 10, but the genes (or variants) in these regions contributing to disease risk have yet to be identified. Genome-wide association is a powerful method that has been successful in locating genetic variants contributing to a range of common diseases. Several groups are planning these studies in endometriosis. For this to be successful, the endometriosis research community must work together to genotype sufficient cases, using clearly defined disease classifications, and conduct the necessary replication studies in several thousands of cases and controls. CONCLUSIONS: Genes with convincing evidence for association with endometriosis are likely to be identified in large genome-wide studies. This will provide a starting point for functional and biological studies to develop better diagnosis and treatment for this debilitating disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humupd/dmn016

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite some evidence that endometriosis may be an inheritable disease, no germ-line or causative somatic mutations have been reported to date.

    “Despite some evidence that endometriosis may be an inheritable disease, no germ-line or causative somatic mutations have been reported to date (Montgomery et al., 2008;Rahmioglu et al., 2012).”

    From Endometriosis and nuclear receptors (2019) · cites this paper as Montgomery et al., 2008

    The Genetic contributions to endometriosis section reports evidence of inherited risk, and the Candidate gene studies section says no gene variant was clearly associated with increased risk. The review does not establish the broader claim that no causative somatic mutations had been reported. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hunter DJ, Kraft P, Jacobs KB, Cox DG, Yeager M, Hankinson SE, Wacholder S, Wang Z, Welch R, Hutchinson A et al. A genome-wide association study identifies alleles in FGFR2 associated with risk of sporadic postmenopausal breast cancer. Nat Genet 2007b;39:870-874.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montgomery, G. W., Nyholt, D. R., Zhao, Z. Z., Treloar, S. A., Painter, J. N., Missmer, S. A., Kennedy, S. H., & Zondervan, K. T.
Affiliations
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
Corresponding author
Montgomery, Grant W.
Venue
Human Reproduction Update
Published
2008
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
447-457
ISSN
  • 1355-4786 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2369
OpenAlex
W2119478717
Cited by
211
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 24
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Reproduction Update (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD050537, HD050537)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, genetic susceptibility, genetic association studies, candidate genes, genetic linkage, chromosome 7, chromosome 10, genome-wide association study, replication study, disease classification
MeSH terms
Chromosome Mapping, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 10, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Genetic Linkage, Polymorphism, Genetic, Risk Factors, Genome, Human, Case-Control Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review