The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Innovative reproductive technologies: risks and responsibilities
Abstract
In view of the global burden of subfertility, efforts are required to make assisted reproduction more effective, less burdensome and more equally accessible. New reproductive technologies are frequently introduced in clinical practice without a sound evaluation of their efficacy, effectiveness and/or safety. Safety issues in this context refer both to patients (mostly women) undergoing the relevant medical procedures, and to the health of children born as a result. Responsible innovation requires making potentially risky reproductive technologies the subject of research, ideally proceeding through the steps of preclinical investigations, clinical trials and (long-term) follow-up studies. The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology is especially equipped to take the lead here.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“obtaining informed consent does not absolve clinicians of their responsibility towards the future child, the prospective parents, and even society (Dondorp and de Wert 2011, p. 1607).”
From Initial heritable genome editing: mapping a responsible pathway from basic research to the clinic (2023) · cites this paper as Dondorp and de Wert 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects
(2003) · Manual for Research Ethics Committees · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511550089.027 · Cited by 2,585
Gandevia, B., & Tovell, A. (1964) · PubMed · Cited by 2,069
(2002) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 733
van Rhoon, G. C., Aleman, A., Kelfkens, G., Kromhout, H., Van Leeuwen, F. E., Savelkoul, H. F. J., Wadman, W. J., Van De Weerdt, R. D. H. J., Zwamborn, A. P. M., Van Rongen, E., et al. (2011) · International Journal of Hyperthermia · doi:10.3109/02656736.2010.534528 · Cited by 604
Mitochondrial gene replacement in primate offspring and embryonic stem cells
Tachibana, M., Sparman, M., Sritanaudomchai, H., Ma, H., Clepper, L., Woodward, J., Li, Y., Ramsey, C., Kolotushkina, O., & Mitalipov, S. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08368 · Cited by 573
DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro or in vivo
Katari, S., Turan, N., Bibikova, M., Erinle, O., Chalian, R., Foster, M., Gaughan, J. P., Coutifaris, C., & Sapienza, C. (2009) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddp319 · Cited by 470
McDonald, S. D., Han, Z., Mulla, S., Murphy, K. E., Beyene, J., & Ohlsson, A. (2009) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.05.035 · Cited by 435
Zucker, D. R. (2014) · Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online · doi:10.1002/9781118445112.stat06924 · Cited by 388
Epigenetics and Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Call for Investigation
Niemitz, E. L., & Feinberg, A. P. (2004) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/382897 · Cited by 325
A review of known imprinting syndromes and their association with assisted reproduction technologies
Amor, D. J., & Halliday, J. (2008) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/den310 · Cited by 311
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 2007, ETHICS LAW SOCIETY, Vol. III, 7
- 2007, SOC REPROD FERTIL SUPPL, 64, 315
- 2007, SOC REPROD FERTIL SUPPL, 64, 425
Cited by
Initial heritable genome editing: mapping a responsible pathway from basic research to the clinic
Ranisch, R., Trettenbach, K., & Arnason, G. (2023) · Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-022-10115-x · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Dondorp, W., & de Wert, G.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-04-18
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1604-1608
- ISSN
- 0268-1161
- 1460-2350
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 41
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Innovative reproductive technologies: risks and responsibilities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/der112
- The paper
- Dondorp, W., & de Wert, G. (2011). Innovative reproductive technologies: risks and responsibilities. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
