The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of known imprinting syndromes and their association with assisted reproduction technologies
Abstract
An association between assisted reproduction technologies (ART) and abnormal genomic imprinting in humans has been recognized for several years; however, the magnitude of this risk and the spectrum of imprinting syndromes to which the risk applies remains unknown. Nine human imprinting syndromes have been identified but current evidence links ART with only three: Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, Angelman syndrome and the newly described maternal hypomethylation syndrome. There is currently a lack of evidence linking ART with the remaining six imprinting syndromes: Prader-Willi syndrome, Russell-Silver syndrome, maternal and paternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 14, pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1b and transient neonatal diabetes. Evidence from clinical reports suggests that the association between imprinting syndromes and ART may be restricted to syndromes where the imprinting change takes the form of hypomethylation on the maternal allele. In contrast, studies of gametes and early embryos suggest that ART can be associated with hypermethylation as well as hypomethylation, with imprinting changes occurring on paternal as well as maternal alleles. The health effects of ART-associated imprinting changes may also extend beyond the nine recognized imprinting syndromes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war
Moore, T. (1991) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/0168-9525(91)90230-n · Cited by 1,281
Buiting, K., Groß, S., Lich, C., Gillessen-Kaesbach, G., El-Maarri, O., & Horsthemke, B. (2003) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/367926 · Cited by 372
Temple, I. K., Shrubb, V, Lever, M., Bullman, H., & Mackay, D. J. G. (2007) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmg.2007.050807 · Cited by 63
Cited by
Epigenetic mechanisms that underpin metabolic and cardiovascular diseases
Gluckman, P. D., Hanson, M. A., Buklijas, T., Low, F. M., & Beedle, A. S. (2009) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2009.102 · Cited by 627
Oxidative DNA damage impairs global sperm DNA methylation in infertile men
Tunc, O., & Tremellen, K. (2009) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-009-9346-2 · Cited by 248
Innovative reproductive technologies: risks and responsibilities
Dondorp, W., & de Wert, G. (2011) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/der112 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Amor, D. J., & Halliday, J.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-09-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2826-2834
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2118587761
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of known imprinting syndromes and their association with assisted reproduction technologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/den310
- The paper
- Amor, D. J., & Halliday, J. (2008). A review of known imprinting syndromes and their association with assisted reproduction technologies. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den310
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.