The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assisted reproductive technology
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of successful assisted reproductive technology and to identify the associated factors. METHODS: This population-based birth cohort study was carried out with 4,333 pregnant women expected to deliver in 2015 in the urban area of Pelotas, Southern Brazil. Use of an assisted reproductive technology procedure, type of assisted reproductive technology [in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection or artificial insemination], number of embryos transferred, success of embryo transfer, number of attempts, and reported reasons for seeking assisted reproductive technology were the main outcomes measured. Use of an assisted reproductive technology procedure was analyzed according to sociodemographic, nutritional, reproductive history, and behavioral characteristics. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were performed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 4,275 newborns enrolled in the Pelotas 2015 Birth Cohort Study, 18 births (0.4%) were conceived by assisted reproductive technology. Most cases of assisted reproductive technology were by in vitro fertilization (70.6%). All cycles were performed in private clinics under direct out-of-pocket payment. Even after controlling for confounders, maternal age > 35 years, nulliparity and high family monthly income were strongly associated with assisted reproductive technology. CONCLUSIONS: The use of assisted reproductive technology services was reported by only a few women in the Pelotas 2015 Birth Cohort Study. Our study highlights sociodemographic factors associated to assisted reproductive technology procedures. To better understand the patterns and barriers in overall use of assisted reproductive technology services over time, national-level trend studies in assisted reproductive technology treatments and outcomes, as well as studies exploring the characteristics of women who have sought this kind of treatment are needed in low-middle income countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The role of conceptual frameworks in epidemiological analysis: a hierarchical approach.
Victora, C. G., Huttly, S. R., Fuchs, S. C., & Olinto, M. T. (1997) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/26.1.224 · Cited by 2,402
Mascarenhas, M. N., Flaxman, S. R., Boerma, T., Vanderpoel, S., & Stevens, G. A. (2012) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356 · Cited by 2,312
Lifestyle factors and reproductive health: taking control of your fertility
Sharma, R., Biedenharn, K. R., Fedor, J. M., & Agarwal, A. (2013) · Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology · doi:10.1186/1477-7827-11-66 · Cited by 845
Homan, G. F., Davies, M., & Norman, R. (2007) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dml056 · Cited by 546
Zegers-Hochschild, F., Mansour, R., Ishihara, O., Adamson, G. D., de Mouzon, J., Nygren, K. G., & Sullivan, E. A. (2014) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.005 · Cited by 540
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2013
Sunderam, S., Kissin, D. M., Crawford, S. B., Folger, S. G., Jamieson, D. J., Warner, L., & Barfield, W. D. (2015) · MMWR. Surveillance Summaries · doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss6411a1 · Cited by 521
Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2012: results generated from European registers by ESHRE
(2016) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dew151 · Cited by 377
2006 assisted reproductive technology success rates; national summary and fertility clinic reports
TOOMEY, K. E., Collins, J. L., Lehnherr, J. R., Brumbaugh, K., Macaluso, M., Chang, J., Farr, S. L., Jeng, G. T., Sentelle, G., Sunderam, M., et al. (2008) · Cited by 363
International disparities in access to infertility services
Nachtigall, R. D. (2006) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.066 · Cited by 347
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2009.
Sunderam, S., Kissin, D. M., Flowers, L. M., Anderson, J. E., Folger, S. G., Jamieson, D. J., & Barfield, W. D. (2012) · PubMed · Cited by 242
Cited by
Nyboe Andersen, A., Goossens, V., Bhattacharya, S., Ferraretti, A. P., Kupka, M. S., de Mouzon, J., & Nygren, K. G. (2009) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dep035 · Cited by 599
Maternal levels of perfluorinated chemicals and subfecundity
Fei, C., McLaughlin, J. K., Lipworth, L., & Olsen, J. (2009) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/den490 · Cited by 385
Elevated risks of pregnancy complications and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal age
Luke, B., & Brown, M. B. (2007) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/del522 · Cited by 375
Assisted reproductive technology and major structural birth defects in the United States
Reefhuis, J., Honein, M. A., Schieve, L. A., Correa, A., Hobbs, C. A., Rasmussen, S. A., & Study, T. N. B. D. P. (2009) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/den387 · Cited by 306
Integrated perinatal health framework
Misra, D. P., Guyer, B., & Allston, A. (2003) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00090-4 · Cited by 235
Metadata
- Authors
- Silva, S. G. D., Bertoldi, A. D., Silveira, M. F. D., Domingues, M. R., Evenson, K. R., & Santos, I. S. D.
- Venue
- Revista de Saúde Pública
- Published
- 2019-01-30
- Volume
- 53
- Pages
- 13
- ISSN
- 0034-8910 (ISSN-L)
- 1518-8787
- OpenAlex
- W2913363557
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 10.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assisted reproductive technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.11606/s1518-8787.2019053000737
- The paper
- Silva, S. G. D., Bertoldi, A. D., Silveira, M. F. D., Domingues, M. R., Evenson, K. R., & Santos, I. S. D. (2019). Assisted reproductive technology. Revista de Saúde Pública. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2019053000737
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.