Cited by 125Reproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Health and ContraceptionAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy

Disparities in access to effective treatment for infertility in the United States: an Ethics Committee opinion

Open access
·2021·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

In the United States, economic, racial, ethnic, geographic, and other disparities prevent access to fertility treatment and affect treatment outcomes. This opinion examines the factors that contribute to these disparities, proposes actions to address them, and replaces the document of the same name, last published in 2015.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.02.019

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Accessibility and utilization are affected by physical features of clinics, limitation of reproductive health information, and a regulatory environment that might restrict services and/or discriminate.

    “Accessibility and utilization are affected by physical features of clinics (e.g. access for the disabled, male services available only in female clinics), limitation of reproductive health information, and a regulatory environment that might restrict services and/or discriminate, e.g. LGBTQ+ or single people (ASRM The Ethics Committee, 2021; Oliveira et al., 2021).”

    From Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature (2024) · cites this paper as ASRM The Ethics Committee, 2021

    The “Other Disparities in Access to Infertility Treatment” section says that withholding treatment information and refusing care to unpartnered people or same-sex couples impair access. “Economic Barriers to Treatment” describes insurance laws that excluded or restricted coverage for those groups. The copy does not address the cited examples of clinics’ physical accessibility or male services being available only in female clinics; page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Distinct disparities in infertility care exist, largely due to barriers to access aligned with race, class, socioeconomic status, gender, sexual orientation, and other forms of difference.

    “Distinct disparities in infertility care exist, largely due to barriers to access aligned with race, class, socioeconomic status, gender, sexual orientation, and other forms of difference (ASRM The Ethics Committee, 2021).”
  • Due to high cost and/or unaffordability, ART remains out of reach for many, even in resource-rich countries.

    “Due to high cost and/or unaffordability, ART remains out of reach for many, even in resource-rich countries (Dyer et al., 2020; ASRM The Ethics Committee, 2021; Njagi et al., 2023).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [5]5. Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942). Available at https://scholar. google.com/scholar_case?case=8050731321644873759&q=Skinner+v.
  2. [11]11. American Medical Association (AMA). Resolution, 2017. Available at: https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/public-health/ama-backs-glo bal-health-experts-calling-infertility-disease. Accessed February 9, 2021.
  3. [17]17. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. ART fact sheet. Available at: https://www.eshre.eu/Press-Room/Resources. Accessed June 2, 2021.
  4. [65]65. Duke CC, Stanik C. Overcoming lower-income patients' concerns about trust and respect from providers. Available at: https://www.healthaffairs. org/do/10.1377/hblog20160811.056138/full/. Accessed July 11, 2019. · DOI
  5. [71]71. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG committee opinion no. 586: health disparities in rural women. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:384-8.
  6. [76]76. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Ac- cess to fertility treatment irrespective of marital status, sexual orientation, or gender identity: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. In press.
  7. [84]84. Davis OK, Sokol RZ. Introduction. Fertil Steril 2016;105:1111-1112. The Access to Care white paper is available at: https://www.asrm.org/ globalassets/asrm/asrm-content/news-and-publications/news-and-resear ch/press-releases-and-bulletins/pdf/atcwhitepaper.pdf.
  8. [97]97. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility evaluation of the infertile woman: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. In press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
116
Issue
1
Pages
54-63
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4205755962
Cited by
125
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
16.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Keywords
access to fertility treatment, health disparities, racial and ethnic disparities, socioeconomic disparities, geographic disparities, treatment outcomes, health equity
MeSH terms
Race Factors, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Infertility, Insurance, Health, Male, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, United States, Treatment Outcome, Health Care Costs, Risk Assessment, Insurance Coverage, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted, Ethics Committees, Clinical, Healthcare Disparities, Social Determinants of Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review