The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Ontogeny of Kin Recognition in Two Species of Ground Squirrels1
Open accessAbstract
SYNOPSIS. We report results of a three year comparative laboratory study of kin recognition abilities in Arctic ground squirrels (Spermophilus parryii) and Belding's ground squirrels (S. beldingi), and a field investigation of kin recognition in S. beldingi. Our laboratory work shows that in both species, preweaned pups reared together, whether they are biological siblings or cross-fostered (unrelated) nestmates, are equally aggressive in subsequent paired arena tests. Thus, pups that share a natal nest are treated like siblings. Among pups reared apart, sister-sister pairs are less aggressive in arena tests than are pairs of nonkin females, whereas relatedness does not affect male-male or male-female aggression. Thus both relatedness and rearing environment mediate recognition among female S. parryii and S. beldingi. In free-living Belding's ground squirrels at Tioga Pass, California, dam-offspring and sister-sister recognition apparently first occur at weaning, coincident with aboveground emergence of juveniles. Most intriguing (electrophoretically identified) littermate full-sisters and maternal half-sisters, which result from multiple mating by females, seem to treat each other differently despite having shared a natal nest. The full-sisters are less agonistic and more cooperative than the half-sisters. In interpreting these laboratory and field results, we explore four proximal mechanisms by which kin might be identified, including one in which recognition is based on (learned) phenotypic similarity to an individual's nestmates or itself (phenotype matching). Our data and those of several recent investigators of recognition in other taxa implicate both association with relatives and phenotype matching in the ontogeny of kin recognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
Of Human Bonding: Newborns Prefer Their Mothers' Voices
DeCasper, A. J., & Fifer, W. P. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7375928 · Cited by 2,317
Vom Saal, F. S., & Bronson, F. H. (1978) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1095/biolreprod19.4.842 · Cited by 236
Cited by
Grosberg, R. K., & Quinn, J. F. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/322456a0 · Cited by 305
Wiley, R. H. (2013) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2012.00246.x · Cited by 136
Female chemical signalling underlying reproduction in mammals
Coombes, H. A., Stockley, P., & Hurst, J. L. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10886-018-0981-x · Cited by 98
Marchi, N., Mennecier, P., Georges, M., Lafosse, S., Hegay, T., Dorzhu, C., Chichlo, B., Ségurel, L., & Heyer, E. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-27047-3 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- HOLMES, W. G., & SHERMAN, P. W.
- Venue
- American Zoologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1982-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 491-517
- ISSN
- 0003-1569 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031013928
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 67.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Ontogeny of Kin Recognition in Two Species of Ground Squirrels1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/icb/22.3.491
- The paper
- HOLMES, W. G., & SHERMAN, P. W. (1982). The Ontogeny of Kin Recognition in Two Species of Ground Squirrels1. American Zoologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/22.3.491
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.