The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanisms of Adhesion in Geckos
Abstract
The extraordinary adhesive capabilities of geckos have challenged explanation for millennia, since Aristotle first recorded his observations. We have discovered many of the secrets of gecko adhesion, yet the millions of dry, adhesive setae on the toes of geckos continue to generate puzzling new questions and valuable answers. Each epidermally-derived, keratinous seta ends in hundreds of 200 nm spatular tips, permitting intimate contact with rough and smooth surfaces alike. Prior studies suggested that adhesive force in gecko setae was directly proportional to the water droplet contact angle (θ) , an indicator of the free surface energy of a substrate. In contrast, new theory suggests that adhesion energy between a gecko seta and a surface (W(GS)) is in fact proportional to (1 + cosθ), and only for θ > 60°. A reanalysis of prior data, in combination with our recent study, support the van der Waals hypothesis of gecko adhesion, and contradict surface hydrophobicity as a predictor of adhesion force. Previously, we and our collaborators measured the force production of a single seta. Initial efforts to attach a seta failed because of improper 3D orientation. However, by simulating the dynamics of gecko limbs during climbing (based on force plate data) we discovered that, in single setae, a small normal preload, combined with a 5 μm displacement yielded a very large adhesive force of 200 microNewton (μN), 10 times that predicted by whole-animal measurements. 6.5 million setae of a single tokay gecko attached maximally could generate 130 kg force. This raises the question of how geckos manage to detach their feet in just 15 ms. We discovered that simply increasing the angle that the setal shaft makes with the substrate to 30° causes detachment. Understanding how simultaneous attachment and release of millions of setae are controlled will require an approach that integrates levels ranging from molecules to lizards.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The morphological basis of weight-bearing in the scansors of the tokay gecko (Reptilia: Sauria)
Russell, A. P. (1986) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z86-144 · Cited by 108
Descriptive and functional anatomy of the digital vascular system of the tokay, Gekko gecko
Russell, A. P. (1981) · Journal of Morphology · doi:10.1002/jmor.1051690305 · Cited by 70
Cited by
Evidence for self-cleaning in gecko setae
Hansen, W. R., & Autumn, K. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0408304102 · Cited by 601
Self-citationBullock, J. M. R., Drechsler, P., & Federle, W. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.020941 · Cited by 172
Recent advances in the fabrication and adhesion testing of biomimetic dry adhesives
Sameoto, D., & Menon, C. (2010) · Smart Materials and Structures · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/19/10/103001 · Cited by 157
Properties, Principles, and Parameters of the Gecko Adhesive System
Autumn, K. (2006) · Biological Adhesives · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-31049-5_12 · Cited by 154
Self-citationBullock, J. M. R., & Federle, W. (2011) · Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/s00114-011-0781-4 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Autumn, K.
- Venue
- Integrative and Comparative Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1081-1090
- ISSN
- 1540-7063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7023
- OpenAlex
- W2098339228
- Cited by
- 596
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms of Adhesion in Geckos. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/icb/42.6.1081
- The paper
- Autumn, K. (2002). Mechanisms of Adhesion in Geckos. Integrative and Comparative Biology. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/42.6.1081
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.