Cited by 64Artificial Intelligence ApplicationsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsScientific Computing and Data Management

Artificial Intelligence for Biology

Hassoun, Soha, Jefferson, Felicia, Shi, Xinghua, Stucky, Brian, Wang, Jin, Rosa, Epaminondas·2022·Integrative and Comparative Biology

Abstract

Synopsis: Despite efforts to integrate research across different subdisciplines of biology, the scale of integration remains limited. We hypothesize that future generations of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies specifically adapted for biological sciences will help enable the reintegration of biology. AI technologies will allow us not only to collect, connect, and analyze data at unprecedented scales, but also to build comprehensive predictive models that span various subdisciplines. They will make possible both targeted (testing specific hypotheses) and untargeted discoveries. AI for biology will be the cross-cutting technology that will enhance our ability to do biological research at every scale. We expect AI to revolutionize biology in the 21st century much like statistics transformed biology in the 20th century. The difficulties, however, are many, including data curation and assembly, development of new science in the form of theories that connect the subdisciplines, and new predictive and interpretable AI models that are more suited to biology than existing machine learning and AI techniques. Development efforts will require strong collaborations between biological and computational scientists. This white paper provides a vision for AI for Biology and highlights some challenges.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/icb/icab188

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AlphaFold combines deep learning innovations to predict three-dimensional protein structures at or near experimental scale resolution.

    “AlphaFold has combined numerous deep learning innovations to predict the three-dimensional (3D) structures of proteins at or near experimental scale resolution”

    From AlphaFold, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Allostery (2022) · cites this paper as [1]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hassoun, S., Jefferson, F., Shi, X., Stucky, B., Wang, J., & Rosa, E.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Fort Valley State University (US)
  • Temple University (US)
  • Florida Museum of Natural History (US)
  • University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (US)
  • Illinois State University (US)
Corresponding author
Rosa, Epaminondas
Venue
Integrative and Comparative Biology
Published
2021-08-27
Volume
61
Issue
6
Pages
2267-2275
ISSN
  • 1540-7063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7023
OpenAlex
W3194290548
Cited by
64
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Integrative and Comparative Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NSF (CCF-1909536, 1939739, 1900572, 1750632, 1951345)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
Keywords
prediction model, data curation, data assembly, hypothesis testing, computational biology, biological theory, machine learning in biology
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Animals, Artificial Intelligence, Biology, Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review