Cited by 547Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

How artificial intelligence is changing drug discovery

Open access
Fleming, Nic·2018·Nature

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/d41586-018-05267-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI is a major driver behind the current trend toward personalized medicine, with treatments tailored to each patient's specific biological profile.

    “AI is, for example, the major driver behind the current trend toward personalized medicine, with treatments being tailored to each patient's specific biological profile (Fleming, 2018;Lichfield, 2018).”

    From Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox (2021) · cites this paper as Fleming, 2018

    The Pattern Recognition passage says some expect AI to accelerate a trend toward treatments designed for patients with specific biological profiles. It presents this as a potential future contribution, not as evidence that AI is already the major driver of the trend or that such tailoring is currently occurring. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • AI-based methods can accelerate the drug discovery process and enable the development of more effective medications.

    “Many more examples are available [3,32,33,34,35,36,37], showing that AI-based methods can accelerate the drug discovery process and enable the development of more effective medications.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fleming, N.
Corresponding author
Fleming, Nic
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-05-30
Volume
557
Issue
7707
Pages
S55-S57
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2806834952
Cited by
546
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 7
FWCI
34.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence, drug discovery, machine learning, pharmaceuticals, computer-aided drug design
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Animals, Artificial Intelligence, Automation, Drug Industry, Humans, Neoplasms, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Robotics, Efficiency, Organizational, Mice, Drug Discovery, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review