Cited by 437Management and Organizational StudiesInnovation and Knowledge ManagementManagement Theory and Practice

A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines

Feldman, M. S.·2003·Industrial and Corporate Change

Abstract

This paper is about stability in organizational routines. It proposes a new explanation of stability, based on mindfulness rather than mindlessness. Traditional explanations of stability (or lack of change) in organizational routines suggest that organizational participants are not thinking about what they are doing, but repeating actions that they have taken in the past. In this paper I suggest that stability can also occur because organizational participants are making conscious efforts to understand what actions make sense in the context in which the work is being performed. The argument is that organizational participants use what they understand about how the organization operates to guide their performances within the routine. Relevant performances, such as the performances of supervisors, are integral to what people understand about how the organization operates. Organizational members use these understandings in choosing whether to enact the requested change. In so doing, they create and recreate the understandings about how the organization operates. This explanation is similar to performative explanations of change in organizational routines, though these explanations have focused on the effect of doing the routine on the production and reproduction of the routine rather than the production and reproduction of understandings about how the organization operates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/icc/12.4.727

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Newly developed solutions do not automatically lead to changes in the organizational patterns of action.

    “research shows that newly developed solutions-regardless of how carefully they are designed-do not automatically lead to changes in the organizational patterns of action (Feldman 2003;Howard-Grenville 2005;Pentland and Feldman 2008).”

    From Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization (2020) · cites this paper as Feldman 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feldman, M. S.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Feldman, M. S.
Venue
Industrial and Corporate Change
Published
2003-08-01
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
727-752
ISSN
  • 0960-6491 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3650
OpenAlex
W2137297549
Cited by
437
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 27
FWCI
19.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Industrial and Corporate Change (publishedVersion)
Funders
NIH Office of the Director
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
Keywords
organizational routines, routine change, mindfulness, mindlessness, organizational understanding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review