A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines
Abstract
This paper is about stability in organizational routines. It proposes a new explanation of stability, based on mindfulness rather than mindlessness. Traditional explanations of stability (or lack of change) in organizational routines suggest that organizational participants are not thinking about what they are doing, but repeating actions that they have taken in the past. In this paper I suggest that stability can also occur because organizational participants are making conscious efforts to understand what actions make sense in the context in which the work is being performed. The argument is that organizational participants use what they understand about how the organization operates to guide their performances within the routine. Relevant performances, such as the performances of supervisors, are integral to what people understand about how the organization operates. Organizational members use these understandings in choosing whether to enact the requested change. In so doing, they create and recreate the understandings about how the organization operates. This explanation is similar to performative explanations of change in organizational routines, though these explanations have focused on the effect of doing the routine on the production and reproduction of the routine rather than the production and reproduction of understandings about how the organization operates.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Newly developed solutions do not automatically lead to changes in the organizational patterns of action.
“research shows that newly developed solutions-regardless of how carefully they are designed-do not automatically lead to changes in the organizational patterns of action (Feldman 2003;Howard-Grenville 2005;Pentland and Feldman 2008).”
From Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization (2020) · cites this paper as Feldman 2003
Cites
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271 · see citing works
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600 · Cited by 4,760 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556620 · Cited by 4,020 · see citing works
Self-citationOrganizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization
Duchek, S. (2020) · Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7 · Cited by 2,027 · see citing works
“…and quick implementation (Smart and Vertinsky 1977); however, research shows that newly developed solutions—regardless of how carefully they are designed—do not automatically lead to changes in the organizational patterns of action (Feldman 2003; Howard-Grenville 2005; Pentland and Feldman 2008).”
BackgroundThinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change
Kaplan, S., & Tripsas, M. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.002 · Cited by 661 · see citing works
Greenhalgh, T., Shaw, S., Wherton, J., Vijayaraghavan, S., Morris, J., Bhattacharya, S., Hanson, P., Campbell-Richards, D., Ramoutar, S., Collard, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.9897 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
Role of routines in collaborative work in healthcare organisations
Greenhalgh, T. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a2448 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Shaping Police Officer Mindsets and Behaviors: Experimental Evidence of Procedural Justice Training
Canales, R., Santini, J. F., González Magaña, M., & Cherem, A. (2025) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.03243 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Feldman, M. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Feldman, M. S.
- ORCID
- Feldman, M. S.
- Venue
- Industrial and Corporate Change
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-08-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 727-752
- ISSN
- 0960-6491 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3650
- OpenAlex
- W2137297549
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 19.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Industrial and Corporate Change (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH Office of the Director
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
- Keywords
- organizational routines, routine change, mindfulness, mindlessness, organizational understanding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review