The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Published Papers, Tacit Competencies and Corporate Management of the Public/Private Character of Knowledge
Abstract
This paper focuses on the movement of scientific and technological knowledge. It explores companies' reasons for publishing in the scientific and technical literature; reasons that turn on the need to link with other research organizations. The analysis begins by establishing that firms do indeed publish. Such publishing mediates links with other organizations, serving to signal the presence of tacit knowledge and to build the technical reputation necessary to engage in the barter-governed exchange of scientific and technical knowledge. Similar processes are seen in other areas of technical knowledge exchange.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2233763 · Cited by 7,530
Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues
Freeman, C. (1991) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(91)90072-x · Cited by 1,784
Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s
Rothwell, R. (1992) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1992.tb00812.x · Cited by 1,499
Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)?
Rosenberg, N. (1990) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(90)90046-9 · Cited by 1,106
Cooperation between Rivals: Informal Know-How Trading
von Hippel, E. (1989) · Studies in Industrial Organization · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1075-1_7 · Cited by 798
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 2nd edition
Kühn, T. (1970) · Science · Cited by 640
The Role of Knowledge in R&D Efficiency
Nelson, R. R. (1982) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1885872 · Cited by 426
Informal technology transfer between firms: Cooperation through information trading
Schrader, S. (1991) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(91)90077-4 · Cited by 405
Gambardella, A. (1992) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(92)90001-k · Cited by 353
Cited by
Knowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey
Breschi, S. (2001) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/10.4.975 · Cited by 1,536
Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration
Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006 · Cited by 1,400
Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge
Cowan, R., & Jonard, N. (2004) · Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control · doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2003.04.002 · Cited by 910
Granstrand, O., Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41165908 · Cited by 745
Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature
Meyer, M. (2000) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00040-2 · Cited by 458
Metadata
- Authors
- HICKS, D.
- Venue
- Industrial and Corporate Change
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 401-424
- ISSN
- 0960-6491 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3650
- OpenAlex
- W1995289002
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 38.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Published Papers, Tacit Competencies and Corporate Management of the Public/Private Character of Knowledge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/icc/4.2.401
- The paper
- HICKS, D. (1995). Published Papers, Tacit Competencies and Corporate Management of the Public/Private Character of Knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/4.2.401
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.