The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Routines and Other Recurring Action Patterns of Organizations: Contemporary Research Issues
Open accessAbstract
This paper reports and extends discussions carried out during a workshop held at the Santa Fe Institute in August 1995 by the authors. It treats eight major topics: (i) the importance of carefully examining research on routine, (ii) the concept of ‘action patterns’ in general and in terms of routine, (iii) the useful categorization of routines and other recurring patterns, (iv) the research implications of recent cognitive results, (v) the relation of evolution to action patterns, (vi) the contributions of simulation modeling for theory in this area, (vii) examples of various approaches to empirical research that reveal key problems, and (viii) a possible definition of ‘routine’. An extended appendix by Massimo Egidi provides a lexicon of synonyms and opposites covering use of the word ‘routine’ in such areas as economics, organization theory and artificial intelligence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556620 · Cited by 4,020
Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change
Feldman, M. S. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.6.611.12529 · Cited by 1,969
Levinthal, D., & Rerup, C. (2006) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0197 · Cited by 744
Handbook of strategy and management
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-1617 · Cited by 710
Organizational improvisation and organizational memory
Moorman, C., & Miner, A. S. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259058 · Cited by 1,248
A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines
Feldman, M. S. (2003) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/12.4.727 · Cited by 437
Heuristics as adaptive decision strategies in management: HEURISTICS IN MANAGEMENT
Artinger, F., Petersen, M., Gigerenzer, G., & Weibler, J. (2015) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1950 · Cited by 255
Economic Opportunity and Evolution: Beyond Landscapes and Bounded Rationality
Felin, T., Kauffman, S., Koppl, R., & Longo, G. (2014) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1184 · Cited by 140
The Role of Ambidexterity in Managing Buyer–Supplier Relationships: The Toyota Case
Aoki, K., & Wilhelm, M. (2017) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1156 · Cited by 130
Disruptive evolution: harnessing functional excess, experimentation, and science as tool
Felin, T., & Kauffman, S. (2023) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtad057 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- COHEN, M. D., BURKHART, R., DOSI, G., EGIDI, M., MARENGO, L., WARGLIEN, M., & WINTER, S.
- Venue
- Industrial and Corporate Change
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 653-698
- ISSN
- 0960-6491 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3650
- OpenAlex
- W2268683859
- Cited by
- 766
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.