Cited by 744Organizational Learning and LeadershipManagement and Organizational StudiesInnovation and Knowledge Management

Crossing an Apparent Chasm: Bridging Mindful and Less-Mindful Perspectives on Organizational Learning

Levinthal, Daniel, Rerup, Claus·2006·Organization Science

Abstract

An important new stream of organizational research has emerged in recent years that draws on the notion of mindfulness. At the same time, there is a long-standing body of work in the organizations literature that emphasizes the role of routine-driven, or less-mindful, behavior. We attempt to connect these two seemingly disparate literatures arguing that, at a performative level, important elements of less-mindful processes are necessary elements underlying mindfulness. In particular, we note the role of established action repertories that facilitate the response to novel stimuli and how routines and established role structures enable mindfulness to be sustained across time and the span of the organization. Similarly, we note important elements of mindfulness that underlie less-mindful behavior, highlighting in particular the role of mindfulness in interpreting one’s context so as to identify what constitutes appropriate action in a given circumstance and in interpreting outcomes that form the basis for processes of reinforcement learning. Although we emphasize the complementarity between the two perspectives, we also note points of tension regarding the opportunity costs of mindfulness and the theories’ implied normative claims.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/orsc.1060.0197

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Given the absence of relevant stimulus knowledge, an out-of-family state may either be ignored or become normalized, and potentially inappropriate organizational responses may be matched to these normalized situations.

    “Given the absence of relevant stimulus knowledge, an out-of-family state may either be ignored or become normalized-that is, treated as if it were a familiar event already encountered and understood in the past-, and potentially inappropriate organizational responses may in turn be matched to these normalized situations (Levinthal and Rerup, 2006;Weick and Sutcliffe, 2006).”
  • Routine-based, history-dependent organizational change may prove problematic when previously unknown forces continuously alter the basis of competitive success, as in highly dynamic environments.

    “research on experiential learning argues that this type of organizational change may prove problematic when previously unknown forces continuously alter the basis of competitive success (Levinthal and Rerup, 2006;March and Levinthal, 1993), as is the case in highly dynamic environments.”
  • Dynamic capabilities can be strategically valuable even in high velocity environments, possibly because an inventory of established change repertories can indirectly facilitate novel action by providing the fodder for new recombinations.

    “It suggests a less extreme position in that these capabilities can be strategically valuable even in high velocity environments, possibly because an inventory of established change repertories can indirectly facilitate novel action by providing the fodder for new recombinations (Levinthal and Rerup, 2006;Wirtz, Mathieu, and Schilke, 2007).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levinthal, D., & Rerup, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Western University (CA)
Venue
Organization Science
Published
2006-08
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
502-513
ISSN
  • 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5455
OpenAlex
W2107828769
Cited by
744
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 57
FWCI
38.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Organization Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Michigan
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
mindfulness, routines, organizational learning, role structure, reinforcement learning, normative claims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review