Cited by 305Marine and fisheries researchFish Ecology and Management StudiesSpecies Distribution and Climate Change

Integrating ecophysiology and plankton dynamics into projected maximum fisheries catch potential under climate change in the Northeast Atlantic

Open access
Cheung, William W. L., Dunne, John, Sarmiento, Jorge L., Pauly, Daniel·2011·ICES Journal of Marine Science

Abstract

Abstract Cheung, W. W. L., Dunne, J., Sarmiento, J. L., and Pauly, D. 2011. Integrating ecophysiology and plankton dynamics into projected maximum fisheries catch potential under climate change in the Northeast Atlantic. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 68: 1008–1018. Previous global analyses projected shifts in species distributions and maximum fisheries catch potential across ocean basins by 2050 under the Special Report on Emission Scenarios (SRES) A1B. However, these studies did not account for the effects of changes in ocean biogeochemistry and phytoplankton community structure that affect fish and invertebrate distribution and productivity. This paper uses a dynamic bioclimatic envelope model that incorporates these factors to project distribution and maximum catch potential of 120 species of exploited demersal fish and invertebrates in the Northeast Atlantic. Using projections from the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Earth System Model (ESM2.1) under the SRES A1B, we project an average rate of distribution-centroid shift of 52 km decade−1 northwards and 5.1 m decade−1 deeper from 2005 to 2050. Ocean acidification and reduction in oxygen content reduce growth performance, increase the rate of range shift, and lower the estimated catch potentials (10-year average of 2050 relative to 2005) by 20–30% relative to simulations without considering these factors. Consideration of phytoplankton community structure may further reduce projected catch potentials by ∼10%. These results highlight the sensitivity of marine ecosystems to biogeochemical changes and the need to incorporate likely hypotheses of their biological and ecological effects in assessing climate change impacts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/icesjms/fsr012

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In response to ocean warming, marine populations tend to move toward the poles and deeper depths.

    “In response to ocean warming, marine populations tend to move toward the poles and deeper depths [4–7].”

    From Shift in Tuna Catches Due to Ocean Warming (2017) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Results report that most of the 120 studied fish and invertebrates in the Northeast Atlantic were projected to shift northward, with distribution centroids also moving into deeper water between 2005 and 2050. This supports the direction of the claim, but the source presents a regional model projection under climate-change scenarios, not a general observed tendency across marine populations in response to warming alone. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Ainsworth, C. H., Samhouri, J. F., Busch, D. S., Cheung, W. W. L., Dunne, J. P., and Okey, T. A. 2011. Potential impacts of climate change on Northeast Pacific marine foodwebs and fisheries. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 68: 1217 -1229.
  2. Beaugrand, G., Edwards, M., and Legendre, L. 2010. Marine biodiver- sity, ecosystem functioning, and carbon cycles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 107: 10120-10124.
  3. Binohlan, C., and Froese, R. 2009. Empirical equations for estimating maximum length from length at first maturity. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 25: 611-619.
  4. Beverton, R. J. H., and Holt, S. J. 1959. A review of the life span and mortality rate of fish in nature and the relation to growth and other physiological characteristics. In CIBA Foundation Colloquia on Ageing: the Lifespan of Animals, 5, pp. 142 -177.
  5. Clarke, A., and Johnston, N. M. 1999. Scaling of metabolic rate with body mass and temperature in teleost fish. Journal of Animal Ecology, 68: 893 -905.
  6. Close, C., Cheung, W. W. L., Hodgson, S., Lam, V., Watson, R., and Pauly, D. 2006. Distribution ranges of commercial fishes and invertebrates. In Fishes in Databases and Ecosystems, pp. 27-37.
  7. Doney, S. C., Fabry, V. J., Feely, R. A., and Kleypas, J. A. 2009. Ocean acidification: the other CO 2 problem. Annual Review of Marine Science, 1: 169-192.
  8. Dulvy, N. K., Rogers, S. I., Jennings, S., Stelzenmu ¨ller, V., Dye, S. R., and Skjoldal, H. R. 2008. Climate change and deepening of the North Sea fish assemblage: a biotic indicator of warming seas. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45: 1029 -1039.
  9. Dunne, J. P., Armstrong, R. A., Gnanadesikan, A., and Sarmiento, J. L. 2005. Empirical and mechanistic models for the particle export ratio. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 19: GB4026, doi:10.1029/ 2004GB002390. · DOI
  10. Dunne, J. P., Sarmiento, J. L., and Gnanadesikan, A. 2007. A synthesis of global particle export from the surface ocean and cycling through the ocean interior and on the seafloor. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 21: doi:10.1029/2006GB002907. · DOI
  11. Elith, J., and Leathwick, J. R. 2009. Species distribution models: eco- logical explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 40: 677 -697.
  12. Friedrichs, M. A. M., Carr, M., Barber, R. T., Scardi, M., Antoine, D., Armstrong, R. A., Asanuma, I., et al. 2009. Assessing the uncertain- ties of model estimates of primary productivity in the tropical Pacific Ocean. Journal of Marine Systems, 76: 113-133.
  13. Gooding, R. A., Harley, C. D. G., and Tang, E. 2009. Elevated water temperature and carbon dioxide concentration increase the growth of a keystone echinoderm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106: 9316-9321.
  14. Guinotte, J. M., and Fabry, V. J. 2008. Ocean acidification and its potential effects on marine ecosystems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1134: 320-342.
  15. IPCC. 2007. Summary for policymakers. In Climate Change 2007: the Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC, pp. 1 -18. Ed. by S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor, et al. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  16. Jump, A. S., and Pen ˜uelas, J. 2005. Running to stand still: adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate change. Ecology Letters, 8: 1010-1020.
  17. Kolding, J., Haug, L., and Stefansson, S. 2008. Effect of ambient oxygen on growth and reproduction in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 65: 1413-1424.
  18. Mitani, F. 1970. A comparative study on growth patterns of marine fishes. Bulletin of the Japanese Society for the Science of Fish, 36: 258-265.
  19. Munday, P. L., Dixson, D. L., Donelson, J. M., Jones, G. P., Pratchett, M. S., Devitsina, G. V., and Døving, K. B. 2009b. Ocean acidifica- tion impairs olfactory discrimination and homing ability of a marine fish. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106: 1848-1852.
  20. Parmesan, C. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 37: 637-669.
  21. Pauly, D. 1980. On the interrelationships between natural mortality, growth parameters and mean environmental temperature in 175 fish stocks. Journal du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer, 39: 175 -192.
  22. Pauly, D. 1984. A mechanism for the juvenile-to-adult transition in fishes. Journal du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer, 41: 280 -284.
  23. Pauly, D. 1998. Tropical fishes: patterns and propensities. Journal of Fish Biology, 53(Suppl. A): 1 -17.
  24. Po ¨rtner, H-O. 2010. Oxygen-and capacity-limitation of thermal toler- ance: a matrix for integrating climate-related stressor effects in marine ecosystems. Journal of Experimental Biology, 213: 881-893.
  25. Quinn, T. J., and Deriso, R. B. 1999. Quantitative Fish Dynamics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  26. Rosa, R., and Seibel, B. A. 2008. Synergistic effects of climate-related variables suggest future physiological impairment in a top oceanic predator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105: 20776-20780.
  27. Stock, C. A., Alexander, M. A., Bond, N. A., Brander, K., Cheung, W. W. L., Curchitser, E. N., Delworth, T. L., et al. 2010. On the use of IPCC-class models to assess the impact of climate on living marine resources. Progress in Oceanography, doi:10.1016/ j.pocean.2010.09.001. · DOI
  28. Taylor, C. C. 1958. Cod growth and temperature. Journal du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer, 23: 366 -370.
  29. Wood, H. L., Spicer, J. I., and Widdicombe, S. 2008. Ocean acidification may increase calcification rates, but at a cost. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 275: 1767-1773.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheung, W. W. L., Dunne, J., Sarmiento, J. L., & Pauly, D.
Affiliations
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Cheung, William W. L.
Venue
ICES Journal of Marine Science
Published
2011-04-13
Volume
68
Issue
6
Pages
1008-1018
ISSN
  • 1054-3139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9289
OpenAlex
W2123299783
Cited by
305
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 25
FWCI
24.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ICES Journal of Marine Science (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ford Motor Company
  • Princeton University
  • Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science
  • University of British Columbia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
Keywords
climate change impacts on fisheries, phytoplankton community structure, ocean acidification, ocean deoxygenation, range shifts, bioclimatic envelope models, Northeast Atlantic, ocean biogeochemistry, SRES A1B scenario, fish growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review