The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessment of the Protective Efficacy of Vaccines against Common Diseases Using Case-Control and Cohort Studies
Abstract
Smith P G (Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK), Rodrigues L C and Fine P E M. Assessment of the protective efficacy of vaccines against common diseases using case-control and cohort studies. International Journal of Epidemiology 1984, 13: 87–93. Case-control and cohort studies may be employed to assess the protective efficacy of vaccines. The appropriate measure of vaccine efficacy is shown to depend upon the mode of action of the vaccination. Two models of vaccine action are considered. In the first, vaccination is assumed to reduce the instantaneous disease-rate in the total vaccinated population by a constant proportion and, in the second, vaccination is assumed to render a constant proportion of individuals totally immune from the disease. The implications of these two models on the behaviour of different measures of vaccine efficacy in cohort studies is explored. It is shown that the design of case-control studies to measure vaccine efficacy is dependent upon which model is considered appropriate. In particular, under the second model, individuals who have already had the disease under study should not be excluded from the control group.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lysogeny and transformation in mycobacteria: stable expression of foreign genes.
Snapper, S. B., Lugosi, L., Jekkel, A., Melton, R. E., Kieser, T., Bloom, B. R., & Jacobs, W. R. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.18.6987 · Cited by 326
Clinical effectiveness of influenza vaccination in Manitoba.
Fedson, D. S. (1993) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03510160074032 · Cited by 278
Theoretical Framework for Retrospective Studies of the Effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines
Lewnard, J. A., Patel, M. M., Jewell, N. P., Verani, J. R., Kobayashi, M., Tenforde, M. W., Dean, N. E., Cowling, B. J., & Lopman, B. A. (2021) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000001366 · Cited by 103
Kahn, R., Schrag, S. J., Verani, J. R., & Lipsitch, M. (2022) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwac015 · Cited by 76
Long-lasting Permethrin Impregnated Uniforms
Vaughn, M. F., Funkhouser, S. W., Lin, F.-C., Fine, J., Juliano, J. J., Apperson, C. S., & Meshnick, S. R. (2014) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2014.01.008 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- SMITH, P. G., RODRIGUES, L. C., & FINE, P. E. M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1984
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-93
- ISSN
- 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3685
- OpenAlex
- W2165384760
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of the Protective Efficacy of Vaccines against Common Diseases Using Case-Control and Cohort Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ije/13.1.87
- The paper
- SMITH, P. G., RODRIGUES, L. C., & FINE, P. E. M. (1984). Assessment of the Protective Efficacy of Vaccines against Common Diseases Using Case-Control and Cohort Studies. International Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/13.1.87
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.