Cited by 376Smoking Behavior and CessationDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

Cigarette smoking and diabetes mellitus: evidence of a positive association from a large prospective cohort study

Will, Julie C, Galuska, Deborah A, Ford, Earl S, Mokdad, Ali, Calle, Eugenia E·2001·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Only a few prospective studies have examined the relationship between the frequency of cigarette smoking and the incidence of diabetes mellitus. The purpose of this study was to determine whether greater frequency of cigarette smoking accelerated the development of diabetes mellitus, and whether quitting reversed the effect. METHODS: Data were collected in the Cancer Prevention Study I, a prospective cohort study conducted from 1959 through 1972 by the American Cancer Society where volunteers recruited more than one million acquaintances in 25 US states. From these over one million original participants, 275,190 men and 434,637 women aged > or = 30 years were selected for the primary analysis using predetermined criteria. RESULTS: As smoking increased, the rate of diabetes increased for both men and women. Among those who smoked > or = 2 packs per day at baseline, men had a 45% higher diabetes rate than men who had never smoked; the comparable increase for women was 74%. Quitting smoking reduced the rate of diabetes to that of non-smokers after 5 years in women and after 10 years in men. CONCLUSIONS: A dose-response relationship seems likely between smoking and incidence of diabetes. Smokers who quit may derive substantial benefit from doing so. Confirmation of these observations is needed through additional epidemiological and biological research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/30.3.540

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Will, J. C., Galuska, D. A., Ford, E. S., Mokdad, A., & Calle, E. E.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Will, Julie C
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2001-06
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
540-546
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2103147983
Cited by
376
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 20
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
cigarette smoking, diabetes mellitus, smoking frequency, smoking cessation, diabetes incidence, dose-response relationship, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Smoking, United States, Incidence, Proportional Hazards Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review