Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 262

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cohort Profile: The Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study, a Guangzhou–Hong Kong–Birmingham collaboration

Open access
Jiang, Chaoqiang, Thomas, G Neil, Lam, Tai Hing, Schooling, C Mary, Zhang, Weisen, Lao, Xiangqian, Adab, Peymane, Liu, Bin, Leung, Gabriel M, Cheng, Kar Keung·2006·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

The Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study (GBCS), initiated by TH Lam (Hong Kong), CQ Jiang (Guangzhou), and KK Cheng (Birmingham), has been in part modelled on the Kadoorie Study of Chronic Disease in China (KSCDC)1 and the UK Biobank.2 Initial seed funding came from the Universities of Hong Kong and Birmingham, the Guangzhou No. 12 Hospital (Guangzhou Occupational Disease Prevention & Treatment Centre), the Guangzhou Public Health Bureau, and the Guangzhou Science and Technology Bureau. The Clinical Trials Service Unit at Oxford University has provided technical advice, especially in the planning and setting up of the project. Whereas the KSCDC recruits adults aged 35–74 years nationwide from five rural counties and five urban districts, the GBCS focuses on older people aged at least 50 years in a mega-city of ∼10 million. Of these, 6.4 million are permanent residents with locally registered households and the remainder are mostly migrants from other parts of the country. Guangzhou, the provincial capital of Guangdong province in southern China, is one of the most economically developed regions of China (Figure 1). Uniquely, the lifetime experience of older urban residents in Guangzhou has straddled two macro-environments. Their parents were born into a pre-industrial environment, where living standards had been essentially unchanged for millennia3,4 and where male heights (an anthropometric marker of living standards) were similar to those in France at their pre-industrial nadir.5–10 These circumstances largely continued until after the establishment of the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1949, although there were some isolated pockets of transient, haphazard economic growth along the eastern seaboard and around the treaty ports of Shanghai and to a lesser extent Guangzhou during the first half of the 20th century.11,12 However, with the more inclusive route to economic development taken by the PRC, and in recent decades following the establishment of the special economic zones close to Hong Kong in 1978, Guangzhou has been transformed and its residents' lives with it. Inevitably, this very rapid economic progress has been neither smooth nor comprehensive. There have been periods of significant hardships such as during the Japanese occupation in the 1940s, the Great Leap Forward in the late 1950s,13 and the Cultural Revolution in the 1960s. There are also inequalities, and one specifically relevant to this study is the current difficulty of access to medical care after the large-scale privatization of health care facilities since the 1980s.14 Nevertheless, despite rapid economic transformation, traditional aspects of Chinese culture and social norms have been retained, such as more communitarian values and a Confucian respect for authority, and specific dietary and lifestyle habits, such as low use of alcohol and low female smoking rates.15

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/dyl131

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 262

Metadata

Authors
Jiang, C., Thomas, G. N., Lam, T. H., Schooling, C. M., Zhang, W., Lao, X., Adab, P., Liu, B., Leung, G. M., & Cheng, K. K.
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2006-07-14
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
844-852
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2125371786
Cited by
262
References
37
FWCI
7.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cohort Profile: The Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study, a Guangzhou–Hong Kong–Birmingham collaboration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ije/dyl131
The paper
Jiang, C., Thomas, G. N., Lam, T. H., Schooling, C. M., Zhang, W., Lao, X., Adab, P., Liu, B., Leung, G. M., & Cheng, K. K. (2006). Cohort Profile: The Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study, a Guangzhou–Hong Kong–Birmingham collaboration. International Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyl131

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.