Cited by 1,055Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyEthics in Clinical ResearchHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging

Million Veteran Program: A mega-biobank to study genetic influences on health and disease

Open access
Gaziano, John Michael, Concato, John, Brophy, Mary, Fiore, Louis, Pyarajan, Saiju, Breeling, James, Whitbourne, Stacey, Deen, Jennifer +13 more·2016·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the design and ongoing conduct of the Million Veteran Program (MVP), as an observational cohort study and mega-biobank in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Data are being collected from participants using questionnaires, the VA electronic health record, and a blood sample for genomic and other testing. Several ongoing projects are linked to MVP, both as peer-reviewed research studies and as activities to help develop an infrastructure for future, broad-based research uses. RESULTS: Formal planning for MVP commenced in 2009; the protocol was approved in 2010, and enrollment began in 2011. As of August 3, 2015, and with a steady state of ≈50 recruiting sites nationwide, N = 397,104 veterans have been enrolled. Among N = 199,348 with currently available genotyping data, most participants (as expected) are male (92.0%) between the ages of 50 and 69 years (55.0%). On the basis of self-reported race, white (77.2%) and African American (13.5%) populations are well represented. CONCLUSIONS: By helping to promote the future integration of genetic testing in health care delivery, including clinical decision making, the MVP is designed to contribute to the development of precision medicine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.09.016

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The US Department of Veteran Affairs launched the Million Veteran Program in 2011, aiming to enroll 1 million veterans to contribute to scientific discovery.

    “In the USA, the Department of Veteran Affairs launched the Million Veteran Program 88 in 2011, aiming to enroll 1 million veterans to contribute to scientific discovery.”

    From Multimodal biomedical AI (2022) · cites this paper as [88]

  • The chromosome 7 intergenic locus from ISGC stayed significant after conditioning on psychiatric disorders and was independently replicated in the MVP cohort.

    “The intergenic locus on chromosome 7 remained significant after conditioning on psychiatric disorders and was independently replicated (p=3.27×10−3) (8) in the Million Veteran Program (MVP) cohort (9).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Collins FS. Human genome collection. Available at http://www.nature. com/nature/supplements/collections/humangenome/index.html Ac- cessed July 9, 2015.
  2. Landrigan PJ, Baker DB. The National Children's Studydend or new beginning? N Engl J Med 2015;372:1486e7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaziano, J. M., Concato, J., Brophy, M., Fiore, L., Pyarajan, S., Breeling, J., Whitbourne, S., Deen, J., Shannon, C., Humphries, D., Guarino, P., Aslan, M., Anderson, D., LaFleur, R., Hammond, T., Schaa, K., Moser, J., Huang, G., Muralidhar, S., Przygodzki, R., & O'Leary, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
  • VA Connecticut Healthcare System (US)
  • Veterans Health Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Concato, John
Venue
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
70
Pages
214-223
ISSN
0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1911952697
Cited by
1,055
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 114 · 2025: 142 · 2024: 154 · 2023: 139 · 2022: 137 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
23.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Kaiser Permanente
  • Office of Research and Development
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Keywords
Million Veteran Program, biobanks, veterans, genetic epidemiology, precision medicine, electronic health records, genotyping, cohort studies, research infrastructure
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Female, Genotype, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, United States, Veterans, Sequence Analysis, Biological Specimen Banks, Genomics, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review