The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inequalities in participation in an organized national colorectal cancer screening programme: results from the first 2.6 million invitations in England
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An organized, population-based, colorectal cancer screening programme was initiated in England in 2006 offering biennial faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) to adults aged 60-69 years. Organized screening programmes with no associated financial costs to the individual should minimize barriers to access for lower socio-economic status (SES) groups. However, SES differences in uptake were observed in the pilot centres of the UK programme, so the aim of this analysis was to identify the extent of inequalities in uptake by SES, ethnic diversity, gender and age in the first 28 months of the programme. Design Cross-sectional analysis of colorectal cancer screening uptake data. METHODS: Between October 2006 and January 2009, over 2.6 million adults aged 60-69 years were mailed a first FOBT kit by the five regional screening hubs. Uptake was defined as return of a test kit within 13 weeks. We used multivariate generalized linear regression to examine variation by area-based socioeconomic deprivation, area-based ethnicity, gender and age. RESULTS: Uptake was 54%, but showed a gradient across quintiles of deprivation, ranging from 35% in the most deprived quintile to 61% in the least deprived. Multivariate analyses confirmed an independent effect of deprivation, with stronger effects in women and older people. The most ethnically diverse areas also had lower uptake (38%) than other areas (52-58%) independent of SES, age, gender and regional screening hub. Ethnic disparities were more pronounced in men but equivalent across age groups. More women than men returned a kit (56 vs 51%), but there was also an interaction with age, with uptake increasing with age in men (49% at 60-64 years; 53% at 65-69 years) but not women (57 vs 56%). CONCLUSIONS: Overall uptake rates in this organized screening programme were encouraging, but nonetheless there was low uptake in the most ethnically diverse areas and a striking gradient by SES. Action to promote equality of uptake is needed to avoid widening inequalities in cancer mortality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health in 22 European Countries
Mackenbach, J. P., Stirbu, I., Roskam, A.-J. R., Schaap, M. M., Menvielle, G., Leinsalu, M., & Kunst, A. E. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa0707519 · Cited by 3,302
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force* (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00243 · Cited by 1,959
The English indices of deprivation 2004
Noble, M., Wright, G., Dibben, C., Smith, G., McLennan, D., Anttila, C., Barnes, H., Mokhtar, C., Noble, S., & Gardner, J. (2004) · Cited by 1,494
Screening for Colorectal Cancer
Eddy, D. M. (1990) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-113-5-373 · Cited by 1,200
The Social Stratification of Aging and Health
House, J. S., Lepkowski, J. M., Kinney, A. M., Mero, R. P., Kessler, R. C., & Herzog, A. R. (1994) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2137277 · Cited by 950
Structural Determinants of Men's and Women's Personal Networks
Moore, G. (1990) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095868 · Cited by 930
Smith, R. A., von Eschenbach, A. C., Wender, R., Levin, B., Byers, T., Rothenberger, D., Brooks, D., Creasman, W., Cohen, C., Runowicz, C., et al. (2001) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.51.1.38 · Cited by 821
Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population
Seeff, L. C., Nadel, M. R., Klabunde, C. N., Thompson, T., Shapiro, J. A., Vernon, S. W., & Coates, R. J. (2004) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.20276 · Cited by 538
Palencia, L., Espelt, A., Rodriguez-Sanz, M., Puigpinos, R., Pons-Vigues, M., Pasarin, M. I., Spadea, T., Kunst, A. E., & Borrell, C. (2010) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyq003 · Cited by 430
Health Literacy and Health Actions: A Review and a Framework From Health Psychology
von Wagner, C., Steptoe, A., Wolf, M. S., & Wardle, J. (2009) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/1090198108322819 · Cited by 407
Self-citation
Cited by
Outcomes of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England after the first 1 million tests
Logan, R. F. A., Patnick, J., Nickerson, C., Coleman, L., Rutter, M. D., & von Wagner, C. (2012) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300843 · Cited by 506
Self-citationIncome-Related Inequalities in Health Service Utilisation in 19 OECD Countries, 2008-2009
(2012) · OECD Health Working Papers · doi:10.1787/5k95xd6stnxt-en · Cited by 304
Devaux, M. (2015) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-013-0546-4 · Cited by 275
Socio-economic inequalities in health care in England
Cookson, R., Propper, C., Asaria, M., & Raine, R. (2016) · Fiscal Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1475-5890.2016.12109 · Cited by 223
Self-citationAsaria, M., Griffin, S., Cookson, R., Whyte, S., & Tappenden, P. (2015) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.3058 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- von Wagner, C., Baio, G., Raine, R., Snowball, J., Morris, S., Atkin, W., Obichere, A., Handley, G., Logan, R. F., Rainbow, S., Smith, S., Halloran, S., & Wardle, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-02-17
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 712-718
- ISSN
- 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3685
- OpenAlex
- W2158548262
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 15.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inequalities in participation in an organized national colorectal cancer screening programme: results from the first 2.6 million invitations in England. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ije/dyr008
- The paper
- von Wagner, C., Baio, G., Raine, R., Snowball, J., Morris, S., Atkin, W., Obichere, A., Handley, G., Logan, R. F., Rainbow, S., Smith, S., Halloran, S., & Wardle, J. (2011). Inequalities in participation in an organized national colorectal cancer screening programme: results from the first 2.6 million invitations in England. International Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyr008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.