The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Socio-economic inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening practices in Europe: influence of the type of screening program
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe inequalities in the use of breast and cervical cancer screening services according to educational level in European countries in 2002, and to determine the influence of the type of screening program on the extent of inequality. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed using individual-level data from the WHO World Health Survey (2002) and data regarding the implementation of cancer screening programmes. The study population consisted of women from 22 European countries, aged 25-69 years for cervical cancer screening (n =11 770) and 50-69 years for breast cancer screening (n = 4784). Dependent variables were having had a PAP smear and having had a mammography during the previous 3 years. The main independent variables were socio-economic position (SEP) and the type of screening program in the country. For each country the prevalence of screening was calculated, overall and for each level of education, and indices of relative (RII) and absolute (SII) inequality were computed by educational level. Multilevel logistic regression models were fitted. RESULTS: SEP inequalities in screening were found in countries with opportunistic screening [comparing highest with lowest educational level: RII = 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.48 for cervical cancer; and RII = 3.11, 95% CI 1.78-5.42 for breast cancer] but not in countries with nationwide population-based programmes. Inequalities were also observed in countries with regional screening programs (RII = 1.35, 95% CI 1.10-1.65 for cervical cancer; and RII = 1.58, 95% CI 1.26-1.98 for breast cancer). CONCLUSIONS: Inequalities in the use of cancer screening according to SEP are higher in countries without population-based cancer screening programmes. These results highlight the potential benefits of population-based screening programmes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mackenbach, J. P., & Kunst, A. E. (1997) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00073-1 · Cited by 1,343
Self-citationInterventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening
Everett, T., Bryant, A., Griffin, M. F., Martin-Hirsch, P. P., Forbes, C. A., & Jepson, R. G. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002834.pub2 · Cited by 332
Cited by
von Wagner, C., Baio, G., Raine, R., Snowball, J., Morris, S., Atkin, W., Obichere, A., Handley, G., Logan, R. F., Rainbow, S., et al. (2011) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyr008 · Cited by 340
Income-Related Inequalities in Health Service Utilisation in 19 OECD Countries, 2008-2009
(2012) · OECD Health Working Papers · doi:10.1787/5k95xd6stnxt-en · Cited by 304
Devaux, M. (2015) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-013-0546-4 · Cited by 275
Health Inequality - determinants and policies
Diderichsen, F., Andersen, I., Manuel, C., The Working Group of the Danish Review on Social Determinants of Health, Andersen, A.-M. N., Bach, E., Baadsgaard, M., Brønnum-Hansen, H., Hansen, F. K., Jeune, B., et al. (2012) · Scandinavian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1177/1403494812457734 · Cited by 247
Socio-economic inequalities in health care in England
Cookson, R., Propper, C., Asaria, M., & Raine, R. (2016) · Fiscal Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1475-5890.2016.12109 · Cited by 223
Metadata
- Authors
- Palencia, L., Espelt, A., Rodriguez-Sanz, M., Puigpinos, R., Pons-Vigues, M., Pasarin, M. I., Spadea, T., Kunst, A. E., & Borrell, C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-02-22
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 757-765
- ISSN
- 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3685
- OpenAlex
- W2114316393
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Socio-economic inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening practices in Europe: influence of the type of screening program. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ije/dyq003
- The paper
- Palencia, L., Espelt, A., Rodriguez-Sanz, M., Puigpinos, R., Pons-Vigues, M., Pasarin, M. I., Spadea, T., Kunst, A. E., & Borrell, C. (2010). Socio-economic inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening practices in Europe: influence of the type of screening program. International Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.