Cited by 66Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Testing for non-linear causal effects using a binary genotype in a Mendelian randomization study: application to alcohol and cardiovascular traits

Open access
Silverwood, Richard J, Holmes, Michael V, Dale, Caroline E, Lawlor, Debbie A, Whittaker, John C, Smith, George Davey, Leon, David A, Palmer, Tom +4 more·2014·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mendelian randomization studies have so far restricted attention to linear associations relating the genetic instrument to the exposure, and the exposure to the outcome. In some cases, however, observational data suggest a non-linear association between exposure and outcome. For example, alcohol consumption is consistently reported as having a U-shaped association with cardiovascular events. In principle, Mendelian randomization could address concerns that the apparent protective effect of light-to-moderate drinking might reflect 'sick-quitters' and confounding. METHODS: The Alcohol-ADH1B Consortium was established to study the causal effects of alcohol consumption on cardiovascular events and biomarkers, using the single nucleotide polymorphism rs1229984 in ADH1B as a genetic instrument. To assess non-linear causal effects in this study, we propose a novel method based on estimating local average treatment effects for discrete levels of the exposure range, then testing for a linear trend in those effects. Our method requires an assumption that the instrument has the same effect on exposure in all individuals. We conduct simulations examining the robustness of the method to violations of this assumption, and apply the method to the Alcohol-ADH1B Consortium data. RESULTS: Our method gave a conservative test for non-linearity under realistic violations of the key assumption. We found evidence for a non-linear causal effect of alcohol intake on several cardiovascular traits. CONCLUSIONS: We believe our method is useful for inferring departure from linearity when only a binary instrument is available. We estimated non-linear causal effects of alcohol intake which could not have been estimated through standard instrumental variable approaches.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/dyu187

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An exploration through available resources such as OpenTargets or ChEMBL can provide additional information to establish whether individual loci are likely to represent tractable therapeutic targets.

    “An exploration 1067 through available resources such as OpenTargets or ChEMBL 105 can provide additional 1068 information to establish whether individual loci are likely to represent tractable therapeutic 1069 targets.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silverwood, R. J., Holmes, M. V., Dale, C. E., Lawlor, D. A., Whittaker, J. C., Smith, G. D., Leon, D. A., Palmer, T., Keating, B. J., Zuccolo, L., Casas, J. P., & Dudbridge, F.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Silverwood, Richard J
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2014-09-05
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
1781-1790
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2126701388
Cited by
66
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • British Heart Foundation (PG/13/66/30442)
  • University of Bristol (MC_UU_12013/1, MC_UU_12013/1,9)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12013, MC_UU_12013/1‐9, MCUU12013/1, G0802432, MR/K006215/1)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/I025561/2, ES/I025561/1, ES/I025561/3)
  • ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, University of Southampton
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
Mendelian randomization, alcohol consumption, cardiovascular traits, local average treatment effect, U-shaped relationship, alcohol biomarkers
MeSH terms
Alcohol Dehydrogenase, Alcohol Drinking, Cardiovascular Diseases, Genotype, Humans, Phenotype, Causality, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Gene-Environment Interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review