Cited by 17Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and ManagementHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Injection Drug Use-Associated Candidemia: Incidence, Clinical Features, and Outcomes, East Tennessee, 2014–2018

Open access

Abstract

Background: Injection drug use (IDU) is an established but uncommon risk factor for candidemia. Surveillance for candidemia is conducted in East Tennessee, an area heavily impacted by the opioid crisis and IDU. We evaluated IDU-associated candidemia to characterize the epidemiology and estimate the burden. Methods: We assessed the proportion of candidemia cases related to IDU during January 1, 2014–September 30, 2018, estimated candidemia incidence in the overall population and among persons who inject drugs (PWID), and reviewed medical records to compare clinical features and outcomes among IDU-associated and non-IDU candidemia cases. Results: The proportion of IDU-associated candidemia cases in East Tennessee increased from 6.1% in 2014 to 14.5% in 2018. Overall candidemia incidence in East Tennessee was 13.5/100 000, and incidence among PWID was 402–1895/100 000. Injection drug use-associated cases were younger (median age, 34.5 vs 60 years) and more frequently had endocarditis (39% vs 3%). All-cause 30-day mortality was 8% among IDU-associated cases versus 25% among non-IDU cases. Conclusions: A growing proportion of candidemia in East Tennessee is associated with IDU, posing an additional burden from the opioid crisis. The lower mortality among IDU-associated cases likely reflects in part the younger demographic; however, Candida endocarditis seen among approximately 40% underscores the seriousness of the infection and need for prevention.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/infdis/jiaa024

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Injection drug use was more recently identified as an important risk factor for non-health care-associated candidemia.

    “Injection drug use was more recently identified as an important risk factor for non-health care–associated candidemia (8–10).”

    From Population-Based Active Surveillance for Culture-Confirmed Candidemia — 10 Sites, United States, 2017–2021 (2025) · cites this paper as [8]

    The introduction identifies injection drug use as an under-appreciated risk factor for candidemia, supporting the risk-factor claim. But the Discussion says most injection drug use-associated cases in this study involved recent hospitalization and that healthcare-associated risk factors may contribute more than expected. The paper therefore does not establish the claim specifically for non-healthcare-associated candidemia. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Pappas, 2006, Invasive candidiasis, Infect Dis Clin North Am, 20, 485, 10.1016/j.idc.2006.07.004 · DOI
  2. Pfaller, 2007, Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem, Clin Microbiol Rev, 20, 133, 10.1128/CMR.00029-06 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Barter, 2019, Candida bloodstream infections among persons who inject drugs—Denver metropolitan area, Colorado, 2017–2018, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 68, 285, 10.15585/mmwr.mm6812a3 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Collignon, 1983, Disseminated candidiasis: evidence of a distinctive syndrome in heroin abusers, Br Med J, 287, 861, 10.1136/bmj.287.6396.861 · DOI
  5. Zhang, 2019, The changing epidemiology of candidemia in the United States: injection drug use as an emerging risk factor for candidemia, Clin Infect Dis
  6. Cherubin, 1993, The medical complications of drug addiction and the medical assessment of the intravenous drug user: 25 years later, Ann Intern Med, 119, 1017, 10.7326/0003-4819-119-10-199311150-00009 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Wiese, 2018, Opioid analgesic use and risk for invasive pneumococcal diseases: a nested case-control study, Ann Intern Med, 168, 396, 10.7326/M17-1907 · DOI
  8. Dublin, 2011, Use of opioids or benzodiazepines and risk of pneumonia in older adults: a population-based case-control study, J Am Geriatr Soc, 59, 1899, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03586.x · DOI
  9. Scheidegger, 1996, Incidence and spectrum of severe medical complications among hospitalized HIV-seronegative and HIV-seropositive narcotic drug users, AIDS, 10, 1407, 10.1097/00002030-199610000-00014 · DOI
  10. Saravolatz, 1982, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Epidemiologic observations during a community-acquired outbreak, Ann Intern Med, 96, 11, 10.7326/0003-4819-96-1-11 · DOI
  11. Langley, 2015, Twenty years of active bacterial core surveillance, Emerg Infect Dis, 21, 1520, 10.3201/eid2109.141333 · DOI
  12. Pinner, 2015, Cultivation of an adaptive domestic network for surveillance and evaluation of emerging infections, Emerg Infect Dis, 21, 1499, 10.3201/eid2109.150619 · DOI
  13. Oster, 2015, Population size estimates for men who have sex with men and persons who inject drugs, J Urban Health, 92, 733, 10.1007/s11524-015-9970-3 · DOI
  14. Benedict, 2018, Neonatal and pediatric candidemia: results from population-based active laboratory surveillance in four US locations, 2009–2015, J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc, 7, e78, 10.1093/jpids/piy009 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Deutscher, 2008, Why some injection drug users lick their needles: a preliminary survey, Int J Drug Policy, 19, 342, 10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.06.006 · DOI
  16. Bisbe, 1992, Disseminated candidiasis in addicts who use brown heroin: report of 83 cases and review, Clin Infect Dis, 15, 910, 10.1093/clind/15.6.910 · DOI
  17. Suzuki, 2018, Outpatient parenteral, Open Forum Infect Dis, 5, ofy194, 10.1093/ofid/ofy194 · DOI
  18. Norris, 2019, 2018 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the management of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapya, Clin Infect Dis, 68, e1, 10.1093/cid/ciy745 · DOI
  19. Falcone, 2009, Candida infective endocarditis: report of 15 cases from a prospective multicenter study, Medicine, 88, 160, 10.1097/MD.0b013e3181a693f8 · DOI
  20. Ellis, 2001, Fungal endocarditis: evidence in the world literature, 1965–1995, Clin Infect Dis, 32, 50, 10.1086/317550 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Pierrotti, 2002, Fungal endocarditis, 1995–2000, Chest, 122, 302, 10.1378/chest.122.1.302 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Lodise, 2007, Impact of empirical-therapy selection on outcomes of intravenous drug users with infective endocarditis caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 51, 3731, 10.1128/AAC.00101-07 · DOI
  23. Springer, 2018, Integrating treatment at the intersection of opioid use disorder and infectious disease epidemics in medical settings: a call for action after a national academies of sciences, engineering, and medicine workshop, Ann Intern Med, 169, 335, 10.7326/M18-1203 · DOI
  24. Suzuki, 2015, Initiating buprenorphine treatment for hospitalized patients with opioid dependence: a case series, Am J Addict, 24, 10, 10.1111/ajad.12161 · DOI
  25. Trowbridge, 2017, Addiction consultation services—Linking hospitalized patients to outpatient addiction treatment, J Subst Abuse Treat, 79, 1, 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.05.007 · DOI
  26. Liebschutz, 2014, Buprenorphine treatment for hospitalized, opioid-dependent patients: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA Intern Med, 174, 1369, 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2556 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rossow, J. A., Gharpure, R., Brennan, J., Relan, P., Williams, S. R., Vallabhaneni, S., Jackson, B. R., Graber, C. R., Hillis, S. R., Schaffner, W., Dunn, J. R., & Jones, T. F.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • Tennessee Department of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Rossow, John A
Venue
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2020-09-02
Volume
222
Issue
Supplement_5
Pages
S442-S450
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W3081802697
Cited by
17
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U50CK000198)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Keywords
candidemia, intravenous drug use, people who inject drugs, Candida endocarditis, opioid epidemic, candidemia incidence, mortality, East Tennessee, surveillance (medicine)
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Candida, Endocarditis, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Records, Risk Factors, Tennessee, Substance Abuse, Intravenous, Incidence, Hospital Mortality, Drug Users, Candidemia, Epidemiological Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review