Cited by 1,315Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesOcular Infections and Treatments

Invasive candidiasis

Open access
Kullberg, Bart Jan, Arendrup, Maiken C.·2015·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Despite advances in antifungal therapy, the mortality associated with invasive candidiasis remains as high as 40%. This review summarizes recent trends and current strategies, including early treatment and the emergence of resistance against triazoles and echinocandins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmra1315399

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies did not observe an association between antimicrobial timing and mortality.

    “Other studies, however, did not observe an association between antimicrobial timing and mortality (112-117).”

    From Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [116]

    The Early Treatment section says retrospective studies associated early antifungal therapy with reduced mortality and that adjusted analyses consistently identified early appropriate therapy as a major determinant of survival. It cautions that early presumptive-treatment strategies have not been validated prospectively, but does not report studies finding no association between treatment timing and mortality. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A review of the most recent data suggests that many, but not all, breakthrough Candida infections occur due to organisms that are resistant to one or more antifungals, and are dominated by non-albicans Candida species, especially C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis.

    “A review of the most recent data pertaining to BT Candida infections suggests that many, but not all, of these infections occur due to organisms that are resistant to one or more antifungals, and accordingly are dominated by non-albicans Candida species, especially C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis.89–92”

    From Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis (2024) · cites this paper as [92]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Candidaemia is the most common form of invasive candidiasis and is associated with mortality in excess of 40% even with newer antifungal agents.

    “Candidaemia is the most common form of invasive candidiasis associated with an unacceptably high mortality rates in excess of 40% even with the introduction of newer antifungal agents [30,32,33].”

    From Global and Multi-National Prevalence of Fungal Diseases-Estimate Precision (2017) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Abstract describes candidemia as generally the more common form of invasive candidiasis. It reports mortality as high as 40% among patients with invasive candidiasis despite antifungal therapy, but does not establish mortality in excess of 40% specifically for candidemia or despite newer agents. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Invasive Candida spp. infections are an increasing concern among US healthcare facilities, as candidemia ranks in the top 4 hospital-associated bloodstream infections in the country.

    “Invasive Candida spp. infections are an increasing concern among US healthcare facilities, as candidemia ranks in the top 4 hospital-associated bloodstream infections in the country [1].”

    From Invasive candidiasis species distribution and trends, United States, 2009-2017 (2021) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Epidemiology passage (labeled Abstract in our copy; page not provided) says candidemia has often been cited as the fourth most common bloodstream infection, but explicitly limits that ranking to intensive care units. It reports seventh to tenth place in most population-based studies, so it does not support a top-four ranking across US healthcare facilities. It also says incidence has increased or remained stable in most regions, while declining in some high-incidence areas. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent abdominal surgery, disruption of the microbiome from antibiotics, receipt of total parental nutrition (TPN), diabetes, malignancies, neutropenia, use of immunosuppressive therapies, and presence of indwelling catheters such as central venous catheters (CVCs) and other devices are all risk factors for candidemia.

    “Recent abdominal surgery and other medical interventions, disruption of the microbiome from antibiotics, receipt of total parental nutrition (TPN), diabetes, malignancies, neutropenia, use of immunosuppressive therapies, and presence of indwelling catheters such as central venous catheters (CVCs) and other devices (8–10) are all risk factors for candidemia.”

    From Population-Based Active Surveillance for Culture-Confirmed Candidemia — Four Sites, United States, 2012–2016 (2019) · cites this paper as [10]

    The risk-factor discussion (page not specified) identifies recent abdominal surgery, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and central vascular catheters; Table 1 also lists total parenteral nutrition, malignancies, and glucocorticoid use or cancer chemotherapy. The cited passages do not identify diabetes, neutropenia, or other indwelling devices as risk factors, so they do not support the entire list. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]1. Arendrup MC. Epidemiology of inva- sive candidiasis. Curr Opin Crit Care 2010; 16: 445-52.
  2. [32]32. Muldoon EG, Denning DW. Prophy- lactic echinocandin: is there a subgroup of intensive care unit patients who bene- fit? Clin Infect Dis 2014; 58: 1227-9.
  3. [62]62. Arendrup MC, Perlin DS. Echinocan- din resistance: an emerging clinical prob- lem? Curr Opin Infect Dis 2014; 27: 484-92.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kullberg, B. J., & Arendrup, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Statens Serum Institut (DK)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2015-10-08
Volume
373
Issue
15
Pages
1445-1456
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4253534765
Cited by
1,315
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 107 · 2025: 127 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 134 · 2022: 147 · 2021: 154 · 2020: 148 · 2019: 116 · 2018: 110 · 2017: 105 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 3
FWCI
13.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
Keywords
invasive candidiasis, antifungal therapy, mortality, early treatment, triazole resistance, echinocandin resistance, Candida
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Candida, Humans, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Catheter-Related Infections, Candidiasis, Invasive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review