Cited by 427Viral Infections and Immunology ResearchViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiologyVirology and Viral Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 18 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Environmental surveillance for polioviruses in the Global Polio Eradication Initiative.

Open access
Asghar, H., Diop, O. M., Weldegebriel, G., Malik, F., Shetty, S., El Bassioni, L., Akande, A. O., Al Maamoun, E., Zaidi, S., Adeniji, A. J., Burns, C. C., Deshpande, J., Oberste, M. S., Lowther, S. A.·2014·Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

This article summarizes the status of environmental surveillance (ES) used by the Global Polio Eradication Initiative, provides the rationale for ES, gives examples of ES methods and findings, and summarizes how these data are used to achieve poliovirus eradication. ES complements clinical acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) surveillance for possible polio cases. ES detects poliovirus circulation in environmental sewage and is used to monitor transmission in communities. If detected, the genetic sequences of polioviruses isolated from ES are compared with those of isolates from clinical cases to evaluate the relationships among viruses. To evaluate poliovirus transmission, ES programs must be developed in a manner that is sensitive, with sufficiently frequent sampling, appropriate isolation methods, and specifically targeted sampling sites in locations at highest risk for poliovirus transmission. After poliovirus ceased to be detected in human cases, ES documented the absence of endemic WPV transmission and detected imported WPV. ES provides valuable information, particularly in high-density populations where AFP surveillance is of poor quality, persistent virus circulation is suspected, or frequent virus reintroduction is perceived. Given the benefits of ES, GPEI plans to continue and expand ES as part of its strategic plan and as a supplement to AFP surveillance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/infdis/jiu384

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

25 Own result · 21 Own interpretation · 18 No basis given · 12 Not checked yet · 1 Own method

Verify all 18 references — free account

Show all 34 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 39
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 7
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
43 of 43
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Infected people excrete poliovirus in feces for up to several weeks regardless of whether they have symptoms.

    “Infected individuals excrete poliovirus in feces for periods of up to several weeks, whether or not they are symptomatic.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many excreted poliovirus particles remain infectious in the environment for varying periods depending on wastewater conditions.

    “Large numbers of excreted poliovirus particles remain infectious in the environment for varying durations, depending on the immediate conditions of the wastewater.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Testing composite human fecal samples through environmental surveillance links poliovirus isolates from unknown individuals to the populations served by the sewage or wastewater system.

    “the examination of composite human fecal samples through ES links poliovirus isolates from unknown individuals to populations served by the sewage or wastewater system.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 1998, Weekly epidemiological record / Health Section of the Secretariat of the League of Nations, 73, 113
  2. 2013, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 62, 1009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 427

Metadata

Authors
Asghar, H., Diop, O. M., Weldegebriel, G., Malik, F., Shetty, S., El Bassioni, L., Akande, A. O., Al Maamoun, E., Zaidi, S., Adeniji, A. J., Burns, C. C., Deshpande, J., Oberste, M. S., & Lowther, S. A.
Affiliations
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • University of Ibadan (NG)
  • National Institute of Health (PK)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2014-10-14
Volume
210
Issue
suppl 1
Pages
S294-S303
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2053989303
Cited by
427
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Immunology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
Keywords
environmental surveillance, poliovirus, Global Polio Eradication Initiative, wastewater surveillance, acute flaccid paralysis surveillance, wild poliovirus, polio eradication
MeSH terms
Environmental Monitoring, Humans, Poliomyelitis, Sewage, Poliovirus, Disease Eradication, Epidemiological Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review