Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 321

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Novel Microbiome Therapeutic Increases Gut Microbial Diversity and Prevents Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection

Khanna, Sahil, Pardi, Darrell S., Kelly, Colleen R., Kraft, Colleen S., Dhere, Tanvi, Henn, Matthew R., Lombardo, Mary-Jane, Vulic, Marin, Ohsumi, Toshiro, Winkler, Jonathan, Pindar, Christina, McGovern, Barbara H., Pomerantz, Roger J., Aunins, John G., Cook, David N., Hohmann, Elizabeth L.·2016·Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) have a ≥60% risk of relapse, as conventional therapies do not address the underlying gastrointestinal dysbiosis. This exploratory study evaluated the safety and efficacy of bacterial spores for preventing recurrent CDI. METHODS: Stool specimens from healthy donors were treated with ethanol to eliminate pathogens. The resulting spores were fractionated and encapsulated for oral delivery as SER-109. Following their response to standard-of-care antibiotics, patients in cohort 1 were treated with SER-109 on 2 consecutive days (geometric mean dose, 1.7 × 10(9) spores), and those in cohort 2 were treated on 1 day (geometric mean dose, 1.1 × 10(8) spores). The primary efficacy end point was absence of C. difficile-positive diarrhea during an 8-week follow-up period. Microbiome alterations were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty patients (median age, 66.5 years; 67% female) were enrolled, and 26 (86.7%) met the primary efficacy end point. Three patients with early, self-limiting C. difficile-positive diarrhea did not require antibiotics and tested negative for C. difficile at 8 weeks; thus, 96.7% (29 of 30) achieved clinical resolution. In parallel, gut microbiota rapidly diversified, with durable engraftment of spores and no outgrowth of non-spore-forming bacteria found after SER-109 treatment. Adverse events included mild diarrhea, abdominal pain, and nausea. CONCLUSIONS: SER-109 successfully prevented CDI and had a favorable safety profile, supporting a novel microbiome-based intervention as a potential therapy for recurrent CDI.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/infdis/jiv766

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 321

Metadata

Authors
Khanna, S., Pardi, D. S., Kelly, C. R., Kraft, C. S., Dhere, T., Henn, M. R., Lombardo, M.-J., Vulic, M., Ohsumi, T., Winkler, J., Pindar, C., McGovern, B. H., Pomerantz, R. J., Aunins, J. G., Cook, D. N., & Hohmann, E. L.
Venue
Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2016-02-08
Volume
214
Issue
2
Pages
173-181
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2298483969
Cited by
321
References
16
FWCI
39.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Novel Microbiome Therapeutic Increases Gut Microbial Diversity and Prevents Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/infdis/jiv766
The paper
Khanna, S., Pardi, D. S., Kelly, C. R., Kraft, C. S., Dhere, T., Henn, M. R., Lombardo, M.-J., Vulic, M., Ohsumi, T., Winkler, J., Pindar, C., McGovern, B. H., Pomerantz, R. J., Aunins, J. G., Cook, D. N., & Hohmann, E. L. (2016). A Novel Microbiome Therapeutic Increases Gut Microbial Diversity and Prevents Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection. Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiv766

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.