Cited by 365Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and EducationClinical practice guidelines implementation

Towards a measurement instrument for determinants of innovations

Open access
Fleuren, Margot A.H., Paulussen, Theo G.W.M., Van Dommelen, Paula, Van Buuren, Stef·2014·International Journal for Quality in Health Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a short instrument to measure determinants of innovations that may affect its implementation. DESIGN: We pooled the original data from eight empirical studies of the implementation of evidence-based innovations. The studies used a list of 60 potentially relevant determinants based on a systematic review of empirical studies and a Delphi study among implementation experts. Each study used similar methods to measure both the implementation of the innovation and determinants. Missing values in the final data set were replaced by plausible values using multiple imputation. We assessed which determinants predicted completeness of use of the innovation (% of recommendations applied). In addition, 22 implementation experts were consulted about the results and about implications for designing a short instrument. SETTING: Eight innovations introduced in Preventive Child Health Care or schools in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Doctors, nurses, doctor's assistants and teachers; 1977 respondents in total. RESULTS: The initial list of 60 determinants could be reduced to 29. Twenty-one determinants were based on the pooled analysis of the eight studies, seven on the theoretical expectations of the experts consulted and one new determinant was added on the basis of the experts' practical experience. CONCLUSIONS: The instrument is promising and should be further validated. We invite researchers to use and explore the instrument in multiple settings. The instrument describes how each determinant should preferably be measured (questions and response scales). It can be used both before and after the introduction of an innovation to gain an understanding of the critical change objectives.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/intqhc/mzu060

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing literature shows that several contextual factors, including HP practices of teachers and parents, HP elements in the school, dominating organisational issues, perceived barriers, and characteristics of the student population, might be of direct importance in the decision to participate and the further process of change.

    “Existing literature shows that in this decision and the further process of change, several contextual factors might be of direct importance, e.g., HP practices of teachers and parents; HP elements in the school (school routine, policy, education, and environment); dominating organisational issues (e.g., staff turnover); innovation-, implementers-, organisation-, and socio-political context-related”
  • The barrier questionnaire used is based on the Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations (MIDI), a Dutch validated questionnaire developed by Fleuren et al. and used in several Dutch studies.

    “The used questionnaire was based on the Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations (MIDI), a Dutch validated questionnaire developed by Fleuren et al. [31] and used in several Dutch studies [37,38].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]Rogers EM Diffusion of Innovations 2003 New York Free press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fleuren, M. A. H., Paulussen, T. G. W. M., Van Dommelen, P., & Van Buuren, S.
Affiliations
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Fleuren, Margot A.H.
Venue
International Journal for Quality in Health Care
Published
2014-06-20
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
501-510
ISSN
  • 1353-4505 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3677
OpenAlex
W2151996204
Cited by
365
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
FWCI
17.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • International Journal for Quality in Health Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • TNO Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • ZonMw (20040008)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
innovation implementation, evidence-based innovation, innovation drivers, scale development, preventive child health care, school-based intervention, healthcare workers, teachers, instrument validation
MeSH terms
Child, Child Health Services, Data Collection, Diffusion of Innovation, Health Personnel, Humans, Netherlands, Preventive Health Services, Reproducibility of Results, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review