Cited by 2,022Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceMarkov Chains and Monte Carlo MethodsData Analysis with R

Flexible Imputation of Missing Data

van Buuren, Stef·2012·Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks

Abstract

Missing data form a problem in every scientific discipline, yet the techniques required to handle them are complicated and often lacking. One of the great ideas in statistical science-multiple imputation-fills gaps in the data with plausible values, the uncertainty of which is coded in the data itself. It also solves other problems, many of which a

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/b11826

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Buuren, S.
Venue
Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks
Published
2012-03-29
OpenAlex
W612972800
Cited by
2,022
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 81 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 268 · 2020: 296 · 2019: 222 · 2018: 204 · 2017: 164 · 2016: 140 · 2015: 144 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 9
FWCI
22.42
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Analysis with R
Keywords
missing data, multiple imputation, uncertainty quantification, missing data imputation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review