Cited by 129Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The process of change for victims of intimate partner violence

Cluss, Patricia A., Chang, Judy C., Hawker, Lynn, Hudson Scholle, Sarah, Dado, Diane, Buranosky, Raquel, Goldstrohm, Sheri·2006·Women's Health Issues

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization is a women's health problem that imposes a significant health and health care cost burden. Although IPV victims cannot change the perpetrator's behavior, they can take actions to reduce exposure to the partner's abuse. The process of change for IPV victims has been described using the transtheoretical model (TTM), among others. We report results of a qualitative study with current and past IPV victims to 1) explicate the process of safety-seeking behavior change for female victims of IPV and 2) explore the fit of the TTM for explaining this process. Based on the results, we propose the psychosocial readiness model to describe the process of change for female victims of IPV. This model considers readiness as a continuum that ranges from robustly defending the status quo on 1 end to being ready to take action toward change on the other. Movement toward and away from change along the continuum results from a dynamic interplay of both internal factors and external interpersonal and situational factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.whi.2006.06.006

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cluss, P. A., Chang, J. C., Hawker, L., Hudson Scholle, S., Dado, D., Buranosky, R., & Goldstrohm, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • UPMC Health System (US)
Corresponding author
Cluss, Patricia A.
Venue
Women's Health Issues
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-09
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
262-274
ISSN
1049-3867 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966768390
Cited by
128
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Women s Health Issues (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
intimate partner violence, safety-seeking behavior, change processes, transtheoretical model, readiness to change, women's health, interpersonal factors, situational factors
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Spouse Abuse, Health Behavior, Safety Management, Battered Women, Crime Victims, Self Efficacy, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review