Cited by 14Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Exploring synergy between azole antifungal drugs and statins for Candida auris

Open access
Halliday, Catriona, Kim, Hannah Yejin, Tay, Enoch, Chen, Sharon C A, Alffenaar, Jan-Willem·2023·Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Abstract

Background: Global emergence of rapidly developing resistance to multiple antifungal drugs and high mortality pose challenges to the treatment of invasive Candida auris infections. New therapeutic approaches are needed, such as repurposing drugs including combination with antifungals. Statins have been reported to exert antifungal effects against various Candida species. Objectives: Our study investigated potential synergy between the statins (rosuvastatin and fluvastatin) and azoles (voriconazole, posaconazole and isavuconazole) on clinical isolates of C. auris. Methods: Twenty-one clinical isolates of C. auris were obtained. Chequerboard assays based on the CLSI broth microdilution method were used to assess synergy based on FIC index (FICI) calculations of MICs of individual drugs and in combinations. Results: Single drug geometric mean (GM) MICs of fluvastatin and rosuvastatin were ≥128 mg/L in all 21 isolates. GM (range) MICs of posaconazole, voriconazole and isavuconazole were 0.259 (0.016–1 mg/L), 0.469 (0.016–2 mg/L) and 0.085 (0.004–1 mg/L), respectively. Combination of azoles with fluvastatin showed synergy in 70%–90% of C. auris isolates. In particular, voriconazole/fluvastatin resulted in 16-fold reduction in voriconazole MIC and synergy in 14/21 (67%) isolates. Posaconazole/fluvastatin resulted in 8-fold reduction in posaconazole MIC and synergy in 19/21 (90%) isolates. Combining rosuvastatin with the azoles also showed synergy against C. auris in 40%–60% of the isolates and additive effect in 40%–50%. None of the combinations was antagonistic. Conclusions: Our results provide a rationale for pursuing in vivo synergy tests as well as clinical studies to explore tolerability, treatment outcomes, optimal dose and exposure targets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jac/dkad303

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11]CLSI. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts—Fourth Edition: M27. 2017.
  2. [13]CLSI. Epidemiological Cutoff Values for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing—Fourth Edition: M57S. 2022.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halliday, C., Kim, H. Y., Tay, E., Chen, S. C. A., & Alffenaar, J.-W.
Affiliations
  • Westmead Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Kim, Hannah Yejin
Venue
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Published
2023-10-12
Volume
78
Issue
12
Pages
2824-2829
ISSN
  • 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2091
OpenAlex
W4387563909
Cited by
14
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
The University of Sydney Infectious Diseases Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
Candida auris, statins, azole antifungals, drug repurposing, drug synergy, voriconazole, posaconazole, isavuconazole, fluvastatin, rosuvastatin, antifungal resistance, combination antifungal therapy, clinical isolates
MeSH terms
Rosuvastatin Calcium, Fluvastatin, Candida auris, Antifungal Agents, Azoles, Candidiasis, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Nitriles, Pyridines, Triazoles, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Voriconazole

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review