The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Lactobacillus, Pediococcus and Lactococcus human isolates and cultures intended for probiotic or nutritional use
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine MICs of 16 antimicrobials representing all major classes for 473 taxonomically well-characterized isolates of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) encompassing the genera Lactobacillus, Pediococcus and Lactococcus. To propose tentative epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF) values for recognizing intrinsic and acquired antimicrobial resistances in numerically dominant species. METHODS: On the basis of depositors' information, LAB were grouped in categories of probiotic, nutritional, probiotic or nutritional research, human and animal isolates and tested for their antibiotic susceptibilities by broth microdilution using LAB susceptibility test medium (LSM). Tentative ECOFFs were defined according to the recommendations of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Isolates showing acquired antimicrobial resistance(s) were selected for PCR-based detection of resistance gene(s) and in vitro conjugative transfer experiments. RESULTS: Tentative ECOFF values of 13 antibiotics were determined for up to 12 LAB species. Generally, LAB were susceptible to penicillin, ampicillin, ampicillin/sulbactam, quinupristin/dalfopristin, chloramphenicol and linezolid. LAB exhibited broad or partly species-dependent MIC profiles of trimethoprim, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, vancomycin, teicoplanin and fusidic acid. Three probiotic Lactobacillus strains were highly resistant to streptomycin. Although erythromycin, clindamycin and oxytetracycline possessed high antimicrobial activities, 17 Lactobacillus isolates were resistant to one or more of these antibiotics. Eight of them, including six probiotic and nutritional cultures, possessed erm(B) and/or tet(W), tet(M) or unidentified members of the tet(M) group. In vitro intra- and interspecies filter-mating experiments failed to show transfer of resistance determinants. CONCLUSIONS: Finding of acquired resistance genes in isolates intended for probiotic or nutritional use highlights the importance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing in documenting the safety of commercial LAB.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Demonstration of safety of probiotics—A review
Salminen, S. (1998) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(98)00128-7 · Cited by 884
The lactic acid bacteria: A literature survey
Carr, F. J., Chill, D., & Maida, N. (2002) · Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.1080/1040-840291046759 · Cited by 724
Bacteremic Infection With Pediococcus: Vancomycin-Resistant Opportunist
Barton, L. L., Rider, E. D., & Coen, R. W. (2001) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.107.4.775 · Cited by 64
Cited by
(FEEDAP), E. P. O. A. A. P. O. S. U. I. A. F. (2012) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2740 · Cited by 904
Safety assessment of probiotics for human use
Sanders, M. E., Akkermans, L. M. A., Haller, D., Hammerman, C., Heimbach, J. T., Hörmannsperger, G., & Huys, G. (2010) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.4161/gmic.1.3.12127 · Cited by 816
Self-citationBender, M. J., McPherson, A. C., Phelps, C. M., Pandey, S. P., Laughlin, C. R., Shapira, J. H., Medina Sanchez, L., Rana, M., Richie, T. G., Mims, T. S., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.03.011 · Cited by 732
Antibiotic resistance in probiotic bacteria
Gueimonde, M., Sánchez, B., G. de los Reyes-Gavilán, C., & Margolles, A. (2013) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2013.00202 · Cited by 691
How to select a probiotic? A review and update of methods and criteria
de Melo Pereira, G. V., de Oliveira Coelho, B., Magalhães Júnior, A. I., Thomaz-Soccol, V., & Soccol, C. R. (2018) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.09.003 · Cited by 523
Metadata
- Authors
- Klare, I., Konstabel, C., Werner, G., Huys, G., Vankerckhoven, V., Kahlmeter, G., Hildebrandt, B., Müller-Bertling, S., Witte, W., & Goossens, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-03-16
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 900-912
- ISSN
- 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2091
- OpenAlex
- W2111207691
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 25.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Lactobacillus, Pediococcus and Lactococcus human isolates and cultures intended for probiotic or nutritional use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jac/dkm035
- The paper
- Klare, I., Konstabel, C., Werner, G., Huys, G., Vankerckhoven, V., Kahlmeter, G., Hildebrandt, B., Müller-Bertling, S., Witte, W., & Goossens, H. (2007). Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Lactobacillus, Pediococcus and Lactococcus human isolates and cultures intended for probiotic or nutritional use. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkm035
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.