Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 417

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ECIL guidelines for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients with haematological malignancies and stem cell transplant recipients

Alanio, Alexandre, Hauser, Philippe M., Lagrou, Katrien, Melchers, Willem J. G., Helweg-Larsen, Jannik, Matos, Olga, Cesaro, Simone, Maschmeyer, Georg, Einsele, Hermann, Donnelly, J. Peter, Cordonnier, Catherine, Maertens, Johan, Bretagne, Stéphane·2016·Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Abstract

The Fifth European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL-5) convened a meeting to establish evidence-based recommendations for using tests to diagnose Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) in adult patients with haematological malignancies. Immunofluorescence assays are recommended as the most sensitive microscopic method (recommendation A-II). Real-time PCR is recommended for the routine diagnosis of PCP (A-II). Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid is recommended as the best specimen as it yields good negative predictive value (A-II). Non-invasive specimens can be suitable alternatives (B-II), acknowledging that PCP cannot be ruled out in case of a negative PCR result (A-II). Detecting β-d-glucan in serum can contribute to the diagnosis but not the follow-up of PCP (A-II). A negative serum β-d-glucan result can exclude PCP in a patient at risk (A-II), whereas a positive test result may indicate other fungal infections. Genotyping using multilocus sequence markers can be used to investigate suspected outbreaks (A-II). The routine detection of dihydropteroate synthase mutations in cases of treatment failure is not recommended (B-II) since these mutations do not affect response to high-dose co-trimoxazole. The clinical utility of these diagnostic tests for the early management of PCP should be further assessed in prospective, randomized interventional studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jac/dkw156

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 417

Metadata

Authors
Alanio, A., Hauser, P. M., Lagrou, K., Melchers, W. J. G., Helweg-Larsen, J., Matos, O., Cesaro, S., Maschmeyer, G., Einsele, H., Donnelly, J. P., Cordonnier, C., Maertens, J., & Bretagne, S.
Venue
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Published
2016-05-12
Volume
71
Issue
9
Pages
2386-2396
ISSN
  • 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2091
OpenAlex
W2384346244
Cited by
417
References
5
FWCI
35.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ECIL guidelines for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients with haematological malignancies and stem cell transplant recipients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jac/dkw156
The paper
Alanio, A., Hauser, P. M., Lagrou, K., Melchers, W. J. G., Helweg-Larsen, J., Matos, O., Cesaro, S., Maschmeyer, G., Einsele, H., Donnelly, J. P., Cordonnier, C., Maertens, J., & Bretagne, S. (2016). ECIL guidelines for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients with haematological malignancies and stem cell transplant recipients. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkw156

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.