Cited by 8Machine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Evaluation of crowdsourced mortality prediction models as a framework for assessing artificial intelligence in medicine

Open access
Bergquist, Timothy, Schaffter, Thomas, Yan, Yao, Yu, Thomas, Prosser, Justin, Gao, Jifan, Chen, Guanhua, Charzewski, Łukasz +374 more·2023·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

Objective: Applications of machine learning in healthcare are of high interest and have the potential to improve patient care. Yet, the real-world accuracy of these models in clinical practice and on different patient subpopulations remains unclear. To address these important questions, we hosted a community challenge to evaluate methods that predict healthcare outcomes. We focused on the prediction of all-cause mortality as the community challenge question. Materials and methods: Using a Model-to-Data framework, 345 registered participants, coalescing into 25 independent teams, spread over 3 continents and 10 countries, generated 25 accurate models all trained on a dataset of over 1.1 million patients and evaluated on patients prospectively collected over a 1-year observation of a large health system. Results: The top performing team achieved a final area under the receiver operator curve of 0.947 (95% CI, 0.942-0.951) and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.487 (95% CI, 0.458-0.499) on a prospectively collected patient cohort. Discussion: Post hoc analysis after the challenge revealed that models differ in accuracy on subpopulations, delineated by race or gender, even when they are trained on the same data. Conclusion: This is the largest community challenge focused on the evaluation of state-of-the-art machine learning methods in a healthcare system performed to date, revealing both opportunities and pitfalls of clinical AI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jamia/ocad159

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [48]48. Davis, S. E., Lasko, T. A., Chen, G. & Matheny, M. E. Calibration Drift Among Regression and Machine Learning Models for Hospital Mortality. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 2017 , 625-634 (2017).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bergquist, T., Schaffter, T., Yan, Y., Yu, T., Prosser, J., Gao, J., Chen, G., Charzewski, Ł., Nawalany, Z., Brugere, I., Retkute, R., Prusokiene, A., Prusokas, A., Choi, Y., Lee, S., Choe, J., Lee, I., Kim, S., Kang, J., Mooney, S. D., Guinney, J., the Patient Mortality Prediction DREAM Challenge Consortium, Lee, A., Salehzadeh-Yazdi, A., Prusokas, A., Basu, A., Belouali, A., Becker, A.-K., Israel, A., Prusokas, A., Winter, B., Moreno, C. V., Kurz, C., Waltemath, D., Schweinoch, D., Glaab, E., Luo, G., Chen, G., Zacharias, H. U., Qiao, H., Lee, I., Brugere, I., Kang, J., Gao, J., Truthmann, J., Choe, J., Stephens, K. A., Kaderali, L., Varshney, L. R., Vollmer, M., Pandi, M.-T., Gunn, M. L., Yetisgen, M., Nath, N., Hammarlund, N., Müller-Stricker, O., Togias, P., Heagerty, P. J., Muir, P., Banda, P., Retkute, R., Henkel, R., Madgi, S., Gupta, S., Lee, S., Mooney, S., Kannattikuni, S., Sarhadi, S., Omar, S., Wang, S., Ghosh, S., Neumann, S., Simm, S., Madhavan, S., Kim, S., Von Yu, T., Satagopam, V., Pejaver, V., Gupta, Y., Choi, Y., Nawalany, Z., Charzewski, Ł., Lee, A., Salehzadeh-Yazdi, A., Prusokas, A., Basu, A., Belouali, A., Becker, A.-K., Israel, A., Prusokas, A., Winter, B., Moreno, C. V., Kurz, C., Waltemath, D., Schweinoch, D., Glaab, E., Luo, G., Chen, G., Zacharias, H. U., Qiao, H., Lee, I., Brugere, I., Kang, J., Gao, J., Truthmann, J., Choe, J., Stephens, K. A., Kaderali, L., Varshney, L. R., Vollmer, M., Pandi, M.-T., Gunn, M. L., Yetisgen, M., Nath, N., Hammarlund, N., Müller-Stricker, O., Togias, P., Heagerty, P. J., Muir, P., Banda, P., Retkute, R., Henkel, R., Madgi, S., Gupta, S., Lee, S., Mooney, S., Kannattikuni, S., Sarhadi, S., Omar, S., Wang, S., Ghosh, S., Neumann, S., Simm, S., Madhavan, S., Kim, S., Von Yu, T., Satagopam, V., Pejaver, V., Gupta, Y., Choi, Y., Nawalany, Z., Charzewski, Ł., Lee, A., Salehzadeh-Yazdi, A., Prusokas, A., Basu, A., Belouali, A., Becker, A.-K., Israel, A., Prusokas, A., Winter, B., Moreno, C. V., Kurz, C., Waltemath, D., Schweinoch, D., Glaab, E., Luo, G., Chen, G., Zacharias, H. U., Qiao, H., Lee, I., Brugere, I., Kang, J., Gao, J., Truthmann, J., Choe, J., Stephens, K. A., Kaderali, L., Varshney, L. R., Vollmer, M., Pandi, M.-T., Gunn, M. L., Yetisgen, M., Nath, N., Hammarlund, N., Müller-Stricker, O., Togias, P., Heagerty, P. J., Muir, P., Banda, P., Retkute, R., Henkel, R., Madgi, S., Gupta, S., Lee, S., Mooney, S., Kannattikuni, S., Sarhadi, S., Omar, S., Wang, S., Ghosh, S., Neumann, S., Simm, S., Madhavan, S., Kim, S., Von Yu, T., Satagopam, V., Pejaver, V., Gupta, Y., Choi, Y., Nawalany, Z., Charzewski, Ł., Lee, A., Salehzadeh-Yazdi, A., Prusokas, A., Basu, A., Belouali, A., Becker, A.-K., Israel, A., Prusokas, A., Winter, B., Moreno, C. V., Kurz, C., Waltemath, D., Schweinoch, D., Glaab, E., Luo, G., Chen, G., Zacharias, H. U., Qiao, H., Lee, I., Brugere, I., Kang, J., Gao, J., Truthmann, J., Choe, J., Stephens, K. A., Kaderali, L., Varshney, L. R., Vollmer, M., Pandi, M.-T., Gunn, M. L., Yetisgen, M., Nath, N., Hammarlund, N., Müller-Stricker, O., Togias, P., Heagerty, P. J., Muir, P., Banda, P., Retkute, R., Henkel, R., Madgi, S., Gupta, S., Lee, S., Mooney, S., Kannattikuni, S., Sarhadi, S., Omar, S., Wang, S., Ghosh, S., Neumann, S., Simm, S., Madhavan, S., Kim, S., Von Yu, T., Satagopam, V., Pejaver, V., Gupta, Y., Choi, Y., Nawalany, Z., Charzewski, Ł., Lee, A., Salehzadeh-Yazdi, A., Prusokas, A., Basu, A., Belouali, A., Becker, A.-K., Israel, A., Prusokas, A., Winter, B., Moreno, C. V., Kurz, C., Waltemath, D., Schweinoch, D., Glaab, E., Luo, G., Chen, G., Zacharias, H. U., Qiao, H., Lee, I., Brugere, I., Kang, J., Gao, J., Truthmann, J., Choe, J., Stephens, K. A., Kaderali, L., Varshney, L. R., Vollmer, M., Pandi, M.-T., Gunn, M. L., Yetisgen, M., Nath, N., Hammarlund, N., Müller-Stricker, O., Togias, P., Heagerty, P. J., Muir, P., Banda, P., Retkute, R., Henkel, R., Madgi, S., Gupta, S., Lee, S., Mooney, S., Kannattikuni, S., Sarhadi, S., Omar, S., Wang, S., Ghosh, S., Neumann, S., Simm, S., Madhavan, S., Kim, S., Von Yu, T., Satagopam, V., Pejaver, V., Gupta, Y., Choi, Y., Nawalany, Z., Charzewski, Ł., Lee, A., Salehzadeh-Yazdi, A., Prusokas, A., Basu, A., Belouali, A., Becker, A.-K., Israel, A., Prusokas, A., Winter, B., Moreno, C. V., Kurz, C., Waltemath, D., Schweinoch, D., Glaab, E., Luo, G., Chen, G., Zacharias, H. U., Qiao, H., Lee, I., Brugere, I., Kang, J., Gao, J., Truthmann, J., Choe, J., Stephens, K. A., Kaderali, L., Varshney, L. R., Vollmer, M., Pandi, M.-T., Gunn, M. L., Yetisgen, M., Nath, N., Hammarlund, N., Müller-Stricker, O., Togias, P., Heagerty, P. J., Muir, P., Banda, P., Retkute, R., Henkel, R., Madgi, S., Gupta, S., Lee, S., Mooney, S., Kannattikuni, S., Sarhadi, S., Omar, S., Wang, S., Ghosh, S., Neumann, S., Simm, S., Madhavan, S., Kim, S., Von Yu, T., Satagopam, V., Pejaver, V., Gupta, Y., Choi, Y., Nawalany, Z., & Charzewski, Ł.
Affiliations
  • Sage Bionetworks (US)
  • Sage Bionetworks , Seattle, WA, United States
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington , Seattle, WA, United States
Corresponding author
Guinney, Justin
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2023-08-21
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
35-44
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W4386025889
Cited by
8
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program
  • ational Center for Data to Health
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (U24TR002306, UL1 TR002319)
  • National Institutes of Health (U24TR002306, UL1 TR002319)
  • Institute for Translational Health Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
all-cause mortality prediction, community problems, prospective validation
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Medicine, Crowdsourcing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review