Cited by 11COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts

Understanding comorbidities and health disparities related to COVID-19: a comprehensive study of 776 936 cases and 1 362 545 controls in the state of Indiana, USA

Open access
Zidan, Nader, Dey, Vishal, Allen, Katie, Price, John, Zappone, Sarah Renee, Hebert, Courtney, Schleyer, Titus, Ning, Xia·2023·JAMIA Open

Abstract

Objective: To characterize COVID-19 patients in Indiana, United States, and to evaluate their demographics and comorbidities as risk factors to COVID-19 severity. Materials and Methods: EHR data of 776 936 COVID-19 cases and 1 362 545 controls were collected from the COVID-19 Research Data Commons (CoRDaCo) in Indiana. Data regarding county population and per capita income were obtained from the US Census Bureau. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine the association of demographic and clinical variables with COVID-19 severity. Predictive analysis was conducted to evaluate the predictive power of CoRDaCo EHR data in determining COVID-19 severity. Results: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes were found in 3.49%, 2.59%, and 4.76% of the COVID-19 patients, respectively. Such COVID-19 patients have significantly higher ICU admission rates of 10.23%, 14.33%, and 11.11%, respectively, compared to the entire COVID-19 patient population (1.94%). Furthermore, patients with these comorbidities have significantly higher mortality rates compared to the entire COVID-19 patient population. Health disparity analysis suggests potential health disparities among counties in Indiana. Predictive analysis achieved F1-scores of 0.8011 and 0.7072 for classifying COVID-19 cases versus controls and ICU versus non-ICU cases, respectively. Discussion: Black population in Indiana was more adversely affected by COVID-19 than the White population. This is consistent to findings from existing studies. Our findings also indicate other health disparities in terms of demographic and economic factors. Conclusion: This study characterizes the relationship between comorbidities and COVID-19 outcomes with respect to ICU admission across a large COVID-19 patient population in Indiana.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad002

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CoRDaCo enables easier participation in national collaborations such as the NCATS N3C initiative.

    “Important secondary uses of CoRDaCo include easier participation in national collaborations, such as the NCATS N3C initiative [49, 52, 53, 54], which will greatly expand the pool of individuals who can directly access this data.”

    From Evolution of clinical Health Information Exchanges to population health resources: a case study of the Indiana network for patient care (2025) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Introduction (Background and significance; page unavailable) describes N3C as a national COVID-19 cohort, and Materials and Methods (page unavailable) describes CoRDaCo as a research data resource. Neither passage says CoRDaCo makes participation in N3C or other national collaborations easier; searches for that connection found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [37]Pfaff ER, Girvin AT, Bennett TD, et al Who has long-COVID? A big data approach [published online ahead of print 2021]. medRxiv. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.18.21265168v1. Accessed October 4, 2022. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zidan, N., Dey, V., Allen, K., Price, J., Zappone, S. R., Hebert, C., Schleyer, T., & Ning, X.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Regenstrief Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Ning, Xia
Venue
JAMIA Open
Published
2023-01-06
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
ooad002-ooad002
ISSN
2574-2531 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4318947300
Cited by
11
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMIA Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Library of Medicine (3R01LM012605-03S1, 1R21LM013678-01)
  • Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, comorbidities, health disparities, disease severity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, intensive care unit admission, mortality, racial disparities, Black patients, per capita income, county-level disparities, Indiana, electronic health records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review