Cited by 192Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationConsumer Market Behavior and PricingConsumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior

Better or Different? How Political Ideology Shapes Preferences for Differentiation in the Social Hierarchy

Ordabayeva, Nailya, Fernandes, Daniel·2018·Journal of Consumer Research

Abstract

As consumers’ political opinions become more divided and more central to their identities, it is important to understand how political ideology shapes consumers’ attempts to differentiate from others in the marketplace. Seven studies demonstrate that political ideology systematically influences consumers’ preferences for differentiation. Conservative ideology leads consumers to differentiate from others vertically in the social hierarchy through products that signal that they are better than others, and liberal ideology leads consumers to differentiate from others horizontally in the social hierarchy through products that signal that they are unique from others. This happens because conservatism endorses, and liberalism opposes, the belief that the dominance-based hierarchical social structure is a legitimate mechanism to distinguish individual qualities. The effect is robust across measured and manipulated ideology, hypothetical and real product choices, and online searches in conservative and liberal US states. Manipulating consumers’ differentiation goals and perceptions of hierarchy legitimacy mitigates the effect. The findings advance existing research on political ideology, social hierarchy, and consumer divergence, and they contribute to marketing practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jcr/ucy004

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The more widespread a political conviction in a population, the higher the probability that the population will adopt political structures that shape reality in line with it.

    “And the more widespread a political conviction in a population, the higher the probability that the population will adopt political structures that shape reality in line with it (Jost et al. 2003;Ordabayeva and Fernandes 2018).”

    From What Is the Function of Confirmation Bias? (2022) · cites this paper as Ordabayeva and Fernandes 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ordabayeva, N., & Fernandes, D.
Affiliations
  • Boston College (US)
  • Universidade Católica Portuguesa (PT)
Corresponding author
Ordabayeva, Nailya
Venue
Journal of Consumer Research
Published
2018-01-29
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
227-250
ISSN
  • 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5277
OpenAlex
W2792967648
Cited by
192
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
33.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Consumer Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Boston College (UID/GES/00407/2013)
  • Portuguese Foundation of Science and Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
Keywords
political ideology, consumer differentiation, social hierarchy, conservatism, liberalism, product selection, status signaling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review