The Mere-Reaction Effect: Even Nonpositive and Noninformative Reactions Can Reinforce Actions: TABLE 1
Abstract
Prior research indicates that a stimulus can reinforce an action if the stimulus is a reward (i.e., a priori positive) or carries useful information. The current research finds that if a stimulus is perceived as a reaction to an action, it can reinforce the action even if the stimulus is a priori nonpositive and noninformative. Mere reactions are reinforcing. Specifically, eight experiments, including a field experiment, demonstrate that individuals are more likely to repeat an action (e.g., inserting money in a donation box or typing a message in a textbox) if the action is followed by a stimulus (e.g., the emission of a sound or the flash of an image) than if it is not, even if the stimulus is a priori negative (e.g., an annoying sound or an aversive image) and carries no useful information. Moreover, the effect just described will occur only if the stimulus is contingent on (immediately follows) the action and perceived as a reaction to the action. Finally, by serving as a reaction, an a priori nonpositive stimulus can become positive. The present work yields theoretical implications for stimulus–response relationships and practical implications for designs of consumer products and loyalty programs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Behavioral feedback can be inherently reinforcing, even independent of the information it provides.
“For instance, behavioral feedback can be inherently reinforcing, even independent of the information it provides (Hsee, Yang and Ruan 2015; Locke, Cartledge and Koeppel 1968; Verplanck 1956).”
From On or Off Track: How (Broken) Streaks Affect Consumer Decisions (2023) · cites this paper as Hsee, Yang and Ruan 2015
Cites
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210 · see citing works
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · see citing works
Shute, V. J. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307313795 · Cited by 4,631 · see citing works
The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation.
Loewenstein, G. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75 · Cited by 2,738 · see citing works
The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543061002213 · Cited by 1,313 · see citing works
Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception
Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1159845 · Cited by 1,119 · see citing works
SMITHER, J. W., LONDON, M., & REILLY, R. R. (2005) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.514_1.x · Cited by 601 · see citing works
Motivational effects of knowledge of results: A goal-setting phenomenon?
Locke, E. A., Cartledge, N., & Koeppel, J. (1968) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0026737 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
The Endowed Progress Effect: How Artificial Advancement Increases Effort
Nunes, J. C., & Drèze, X. (2006) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/500480 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Hsee, C. K., Yu, F., Zhang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2003) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/374702 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Operant Conditioning of Human Motor Behavior
Verplanck, W. S. (1956) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0041472 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The mere deadline effect: why more time might sabotage goal pursuit.
Zhu, M., Bagchi, R., & Hock, S. J. (2019) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucy030 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
On or Off Track: How (Broken) Streaks Affect Consumer Decisions
Silverman, J., & Barasch, A. (2023) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucac029 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hsee, C. K., Yang, Y., & Ruan, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-05-28
- Pages
- ucv022
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W1925730633
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consumer Research (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- negative stimuli, stimulus-response relationship, consumer behavior, loyalty programs, product design, aversive stimuli
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review