The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Node-Injury Scale to Evaluate Root Injury by Corn Rootworms (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
Abstract
Corn rootworm larval feeding on corn roots can significantly reduce grain yield by interfering with photosynthetic rates, limiting the uptake of water and nutrients, and by increasing the plant's susceptibility to lodging. Of the techniques developed to measure the efficacy of corn rootworm larval control tactics, root damage ratings have generally been adopted as the standard because sampling roots is relatively efficient. Historically, the primary scales used for scoring root injury from corn rootworm larval feeding have been the 1-6 and 1-9 scales. A critical deficiency of those scales, however, is that each increase in a root-rating score does not reflect a linear increase in the actual amount of injury to the root system. This results in injury scores that are expressed qualitatively. We developed the node-injury scale to more accurately quantify corn rootworm larval injury based on the proportion of nodal roots that contain feeding injury. With the node-injury scale, the relationship between the numerical scale and the amount of root injury is linear and intuitive. In this article, we describe the node-injury scale, discuss sampling issues to consider when using the scale, and suggest the minimum node-injury score that causes economic damage under varying degrees of environmental stress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aggregation, Variance and the Mean
TAYLOR, L. R. (1961) · Nature · doi:10.1038/189732a0 · Cited by 2,496
Cited by
Control of coleopteran insect pests through RNA interference
Baum, J. A., Bogaert, T., Clinton, W., Heck, G. R., Feldmann, P., Ilagan, O., Johnson, S., Plaetinck, G., Munyikwa, T., Pleau, M., et al. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1359 · Cited by 1,789
Field-Evolved Resistance to Bt Maize by Western Corn Rootworm
Gassmann, A. J., Petzold-Maxwell, J. L., Keweshan, R. S., & Dunbar, M. W. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022629 · Cited by 666
“7 nodes (mean 6 standard deviation; N = 12) based on the Iowa State University root injury scale, which ranges from 0 nodes (no feeding injury) to 3 nodes (heavy feeding injury) [22].”
MethodGassmann, A. J., Petzold-Maxwell, J. L., Clifton, E. H., Dunbar, M. W., Hoffmann, A. M., Ingber, D. A., & Keweshan, R. S. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1317179111 · Cited by 340
Head, G. P., Carroll, M. W., Evans, S. P., Rule, D. M., Willse, A. R., Clark, T. L., Storer, N. P., Flannagan, R. D., Samuel, L. W., & Meinke, L. J. (2017) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.4554 · Cited by 284
Sampson, K., Zaitseva, J., Stauffer, M., Vande Berg, B., Guo, R., Tomso, D., McNulty, B., Desai, N., & Balasubramanian, D. (2017) · Journal of Invertebrate Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.jip.2016.10.004 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Oleson, J. D., Park, Y.-L., Nowatzki, T. M., & Tollefson, J. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Entomology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-02-01
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 0022-0493 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-291X
- OpenAlex
- W2174706075
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Node-Injury Scale to Evaluate Root Injury by Corn Rootworms (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jee/98.1.1
- The paper
- Oleson, J. D., Park, Y.-L., Nowatzki, T. M., & Tollefson, J. J. (2005). Node-Injury Scale to Evaluate Root Injury by Corn Rootworms (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Journal of Economic Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/98.1.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.