Cited by 114Global trade, sustainability, and social impactGlobal trade and economicsInternational Business and FDI

Global value chains, innovation and performance: firm-level evidence from the Great Recession

Open access
Brancati, Emanuele, Brancati, Raffaele, Maresca, Andrea·2017·Journal of Economic Geography

Abstract

This article takes advantage of a newly available survey on the Italian industry to analyze the behavior of global value chains (GVCs) in the aftermath of the Great Recession. We design a comprehensive taxonomy of GVC participation modes and explore their impact on firms’ innovativeness and performance. Our findings highlight relevant heterogeneities in how GVC participants fared the crisis. While high-skill relational suppliers display a significant propensity to engage in innovative activities and R&D projects, other modes of GVC participation have no premium compared to domestic companies. This heterogeneity is also reflected in differential productivity and sales growth. Compared to the precrisis trends, we document a severe demand shock for low-skill and subordinated firms, while relational GVCs appear to be somewhat sheltered from the effects of the crisis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jeg/lbx003

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Control of GVC activities, as compared to ownership, yields increased productivity.

    “An analysis of about 25,000 Italian firms also suggests that control of GVC activities, as compared to ownership, yields benefits in terms of greater propensity toward innovation, increased productivity, and faster sales growth (Brancati, Brancati, & Maresca, 2017).”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Brancati, Brancati, & Maresca, 2017

  • Control of GVC activities, as compared to ownership, yields greater propensity toward innovation.

    “An analysis of about 25,000 Italian firms also suggests that control of GVC activities, as compared to ownership, yields benefits in terms of greater propensity toward innovation, increased productivity, and faster sales growth (Brancati, Brancati, & Maresca, 2017).”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Brancati, Brancati, & Maresca, 2017

  • Control of GVC activities, as compared to ownership, yields faster sales growth.

    “An analysis of about 25,000 Italian firms also suggests that control of GVC activities, as compared to ownership, yields benefits in terms of greater propensity toward innovation, increased productivity, and faster sales growth (Brancati, Brancati, & Maresca, 2017).”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Brancati, Brancati, & Maresca, 2017

  • The mix of horizontal linkages and vertical MNE-supplier linkages has significant influence on the innovation performance of firms in different industries.

    “This structural mix has significant influence on the innovation performance of firms in different industries (Amendolagine et al., 2019;Brancati et al., 2017).”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Brancati et al., 2017

  • Brancati et al. (2017), based on a survey of about 25,000 Italian firms, show that GVCs comprised of firms with strong relationships and active decisional roles in the value chain have a 4-6% higher probability of engaging in innovation and R&D.

    “In fact, Brancati et al. (2017) show, based on a survey of about 25,000 Italian firms, that GVCs comprised of firms with strong relationships and active decisional roles in the value chain have a 4-6% higher probability of engaging in innovation and R&D, and display greater productivity and sales growth.”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Brancati et al. (2017)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brancati, E., Brancati, R., & Maresca, A.
Affiliations
Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli (IT)
Corresponding author
Brancati, Emanuele
Venue
Journal of Economic Geography
Published
2017-03-13
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
1039-1073
ISSN
  • 1468-2702 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2710
OpenAlex
W3121875170
Cited by
114
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
18.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Economic Geography (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (Parthenope University of Naples) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
Keywords
global value chains, Great Recession, firm innovativeness, R&D investment, firm performance, productivity, sales growth, demand shocks, Italian industry, firm heterogeneity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review