Cited by 140Global trade, sustainability, and social impactGlobal trade and economicsSoftware Engineering and Design Patterns

Upgrading in global value-chains: a case study of technology-learning among IKEA-suppliers in China and Southeast Asia

Ivarsson, I., Alvstam, C. G.·2011·Journal of Economic Geography

Abstract

This article analyses technology upgrading in global value-chains, by using unique data from the Swedish-based home-furnishing retailer IKEA and 23 of its suppliers in China and Southeast Asia. We show how these suppliers use IKEA’s technological support to improve their operational and duplicative capabilities, and, more importantly, their adaptive and innovative capabilities. Theoretically, this suggests that typologies of governance structures need to include a ‘developmental’ category, where buyer-driven value-chains are coordinated by powerful retailers with a global sourcing organization designed to facilitate close, local and long-term interaction, resulting in an efficient sourcing of low-cost, finished products, as well as technological upgrading among suppliers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jeg/lbq009

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A relational form of network structure tends to favor inter-firm cooperation and credible commitment.

    “Such a relational form of network structure tends to favor inter-firm cooperation and credible commitment (e.g., IKEA and its suppliers in Ivarsson & Alvstam, 2011 and tuna canning firms in Havice & Campling, 2017).”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Ivarsson & Alvstam, 2011

  • Strong linkages within the GVC-frequently referred to as embeddedness of actors in the network-are conducive to transferring various types of knowledge, including production processes, sourcing practices, technological knowledge, and innovation capabilities.

    “There appears to be consensus in the literature that strong linkages within the GVC -frequently referred to as embeddedness of actors in the network (Henderson et al., 2002) -are conducive to transferring various types of knowledge, including production processes, sourcing practices, technological knowledge, and innovation capabilities (Golini et al., 2016;Golini & Gualandris, 2018;Ivarsson & Alv”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Ivarsson & Alvstam, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ivarsson, I., & Alvstam, C. G.
Affiliations
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Venue
Journal of Economic Geography
Published
2010-04-28
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
731-752
ISSN
  • 1468-2702 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2710
OpenAlex
W2010775983
Cited by
140
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Economic Geography (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Development › Software Engineering and Design Patterns
Keywords
technological upgrading, global value chains, IKEA, supplier relationships, buyer-supplier relations, adaptive skills, innovation ability, home furnishing industry, China, Southeast Asia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review