The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Separating the wheat from the chaff: patterns of genetic differentiation in high gene flow species
Abstract
In many marine species, high levels of gene flow ensure that the genetic signal from population differentiation is weak. As a consequence, various errors associated with estimating population genetic parameters that might normally be safely ignored assume a relatively greater importance. This fact has important implications for the use of genetic data to address two common questions in fishery conservation and management: (1) How many stocks of a given species are there? and (2) How much gene flow occurs among stocks? This article discusses strategies to maximize the signal:noise ratio in genetic studies of marine species and suggests a quantitative method to correct for bias due to a common sampling problem. For many marine species, however, genetic methods alone cannot fully resolve these key management questions because the amount of migration necessary to eliminate most genetic evidence of stock structure (only a handful of individuals per generation) will generally be inconsequential as a force for rebuilding depleted populations on a time scale of interest to humans. These limitations emphasize the importance of understanding the biology and life history of the target species-first, to guide design of the sampling program, and second, so that additional information can be used to supplement indirect estimates of migration rates based on genetic data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence
Berger, J. O., & Sellke, T. (1987) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289131 · Cited by 548
Cited by
Environmental correlates of population differentiation in Atlantic herring
Bekkevold, D., Aandré3, C., Dahlgren, T. G., Clausen, L. A. W., Torstensen, E., Mosegaard, H., Carvalho, G. R., Christensen, T. B., Norlinder, E., & Ruzzante, D. E. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00977.x · Cited by 1,223
Natal homing in a marine fish metapopulation
Thorrold, S. R., Latkoczy, C., Swart, P. K., & Jones, C. M. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.291.5502.297 · Cited by 670
Gene Flow in Complex Landscapes: Testing Multiple Hypotheses with Causal Modeling
Cushman, S. A., McKelvey, K. S., Hayden, J., & Schwartz, M. K. (2006) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/506976 · Cited by 590
Fine‐scaled geographical population structuring in a highly mobile marine species: the Atlantic cod
Knutsen, H., Jorde, P. E., André, C., & Stenseth, N. C. (2003) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01750.x · Cited by 370
The Pacific salmon wars: what science brings to the challenge of recovering species
Ruckelshaus, M. H., Levin, P., Johnson, J. B., & Kareiva, P. M. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150504 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Waples, R. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Heredity
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-09-01
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 438-450
- ISSN
- 0022-1503 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-8505
- OpenAlex
- W2098787755
- Cited by
- 1,292
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.